Results 51 to 60 of about 11,711,564 (342)
Evaluating science communication [PDF]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018 Effective science communication requires assembling scientists with knowledge relevant to decision makers, translating that knowledge into useful terms, establishing trusted two-way communication channels, evaluating the process, and refining it as needed.
openaire +2 more sources
Frontiers in Communication, 2020 We live in an era of abundant scientific information, yet access to information and to opportunities for substantive public engagement with the processes and outcomes of science are still inequitably distributed.
Katherine N. Canfield +11 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Rethinking science communication in a changing landscape
Journal of Science Communication, 2021 Science communication continues to grow, develop and change, as a practice and field of research. The boundaries between science and the rest of society are blurring. Digitalization transforms the public sphere.
F. Kupper +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Post-normal science communication: exploring the blurring boundaries of science and journalism
Journal of Science Communication, 2020 This article provides a framework for analysing changes and continuities in science communication. The field is challenged by three contexts: (1) ‘post-normal situations’ of coping with uncertainties, value questions, an urgency to take action, and ...
M. Brüggemann +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
The sciences of science communication [PDF]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013 The May 2012 Sackler Colloquium on “The Science of Science Communication” brought together scientists with research to communicate and scientists whose research could facilitate that communication. The latter include decision scientists who can identify the scientific results that an audience needs to know, from among all of the scientific results that
openaire +2 more sources
Supporting quality in science communication: insights from the QUEST project
Journal of Science Communication, 2021 The promotion of quality is a critical aspect to consider in the re-examination of science communication. This problem is analysed in the research carried out by the QUEST project, as featured in this paper.
I. Mannino +14 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Ratzinger and science (communication) [PDF]
JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 2005 The death of Pope John Paul II, the "Polish pope", in Rome and the ensuing election of Benedict XVI, the "German pope", have been two big events, which gained world-wide media coverage and affected - and still affect - the whole world.
Greco Pietro
doaj
Internet: turning science communication inside-out? [PDF]
, 2008 In the four decades since two university computers were first linked to each other over the prototype internet, scientific researchers have been innovators, early adopters and prolific adapters of internet technologies.
Trench, Brian
core
Metaphor. The good argument in science communication [PDF]
, 2016 The relation between metaphor and argumentation in science communication is becoming a crucial tool for critical metaphor studies. In this article, by means of a crossed analysis (epistemological, cognitive and linguistic), I focus especially on a ...
Frezza, Giulia
core +1 more source
, 2021 The pace and scope of digital transformation has brought about fundamental changes to science communication. These changes have so far hardly been reflected in the underlying concepts of science communication as field of research and practice.
Birte Faehnrich
semanticscholar +1 more source