Results 301 to 310 of about 17,660,936 (332)

Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct

Accountability in Research, 2005
The Office of Research Integrity has proposed a new definition of scientific misconduct that will substantively reduce the federal government's role of oversight of scientific practices. The standard is being changed despite the lack of evidence about the effects of current policies or understanding of why research misconduct occurs, how it can be ...
Barbara K, Redman, Jon F, Merz
openaire   +2 more sources

Esp—A Scientific Evaluation

British Journal of Psychiatry, 1969
I, Stevenson, J, Beloff, D J, West, H J, Eysenck   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Is interdisciplinary scientific research easily evaluable?

2012
Research is increasingly divided into different scientific disciplines and this tends to lead to difficulties in associating knowledge from different specialized fields in projects of public usefulness such as for medical or OSH research. Is interdisciplinary scientific research easily evaluable?
André, Jean-Claude, Frochot, Céline, Toméi, F.   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluation of camel milk: gross composition—a scientific overview

Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021
Farida Benmeziane – Derradji
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the Literature

J. Informetrics, 2017
Gali Halevi, H. Moed, J. Bar-Ilan
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Scientific Decline: Is Quantitative Evaluation Enough?

Isis, 1984
T HERE IS A STRONG TRADITION of declinist literature in the history of science, most of it focused on England and France in the nineteenth century. Charles Babbage's Reflections on the Decline of Science in England (1830) originated the tradition, registering a widespread feeling among English scientists that English science was in decline, especially ...
openaire   +2 more sources

iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers

Scientometrics, 2016
Ashkan Ebadi, Andrea Schiffauerova
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Evaluating Academic/Scientific Posters

2017
This chapter looks at how we determine what makes a “good” poster, particularly from the perspective of formal assessment. It explores the limitations we face when trying to evaluate large amounts of posters and offers a range of solutions that can help the process.
openaire   +1 more source

SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

The Lancet, 1986
T.J. Goulder, H.A. Bird
openaire   +2 more sources

Xenografts and Scientific Evaluation

IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 1986
openaire   +2 more sources