Results 1 to 10 of about 10,314 (143)
Misconduct in scientific publications [PDF]
Last month I attended the I COPE Seminar - Committee on Publication Ethics (I SCOPE) which happened in Florianopolis (SC) during the meeting of the Brazilian Society for Scientific Editors (ABEC - Portuguese acronym). It was the first time that such type of event took place in South America.For those who do not know, COPE was founded in 1997 by a group
Sigmar de Mello Rode +2 more
doaj +10 more sources
Effect of medical researchers’ creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective [PDF]
Background In recent years, some researchers have engaged in scientific misconduct such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism to achieve higher research performance.
Na Zhang +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran [PDF]
Background Scientific misconduct is a prevalent phenomenon with many undesirable consequences. In Iran, no original research have been done about scientific fraud.
Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations. [PDF]
Background and aimCitations in academia have long been regarded as a fundamental means of acknowledging the contribution of past work and promoting scientific advancement.
Giulia Maimone +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars’ self-reported publication pressure and their self-reported scientific misconduct in research.
Mariola Paruzel-Czachura +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
With the creation of a global computer network, the internet, all manner of information has become available to scientists and everyone else around the world.
Todorović Slobodan +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Criminalization of scientific misconduct. [PDF]
This paper discusses the criminalization of scientific misconduct, as discussed and defended in the bioethics literature. In doing so it argues against the claim that fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (FFP) together identify the most serious forms of misconduct, which hence ought to be criminalized, whereas other forms of misconduct should not.
Bülow W, Helgesson G.
europepmc +4 more sources
Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams. [PDF]
Increasing complexity and multidisciplinarity make collaboration essential for modern science. This, however, raises the question of how to assign accountability for scientific misconduct among larger teams of authors.
Katrin Hussinger, Maikel Pellens
doaj +2 more sources

