Results 291 to 300 of about 388,626 (336)
A Semantics for Means-end Relations [PDF]
Synthese, 2006 There has been considerable work on practical reasoning in artificial intelligence and also in philosophy. Typically, such reasoning includes premises regarding means–end relations. A clear semantics for such relations is needed in order to evaluate proposed syllogisms. In this paper, we provide a formal semantics for means–end relations, in particular
Peter Kroes +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Journal of Child Language, 1979
ABSTRACTThis study challenges the semantic relations categories widely used for explaining children's early utterances. Ten 3-year-olds were asked two sets of questions involving the verb + with construction. Their responses were categorized according to existing semantic relations categories such as instrumental and locative.
Nancy J. Lund, Judith Felson Duchan
openaire +3 more sources
ABSTRACTThis study challenges the semantic relations categories widely used for explaining children's early utterances. Ten 3-year-olds were asked two sets of questions involving the verb + with construction. Their responses were categorized according to existing semantic relations categories such as instrumental and locative.
Nancy J. Lund, Judith Felson Duchan
openaire +3 more sources
Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973Four experiments dealt with the verification of semantic relations. In Experiment I, subjects decided whether an instance was a member of a specified category. For some categories (for example, birds) verification was faster when the target category was a direct superordinate (bird) than a higher level superordinate (animal), while for another category
Edward E. Smith +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Semantics and Industrial Relations [PDF]
Human Organization, 1949 While today's pressing problems of industrial relations may be approached from various angles, the student of human relations in industry is forced to conclude that these are, in part, problems in general semantics.
openaire +1 more source
Samples for Understanding Data-Semantics in Relations [PDF]
, 2002 From statistics, sampling technics were proposed and some of them were proved to be very useful in many database applications. Rather surprisingly, it seems these works never consider the preservation of data semantics. Since functional dependencies (FDs) are known to convey most of data semantics, an interesting issue would be to construct samples ...
de Marchi, Fabien +2 more
openaire +7 more sources
1988
It is common to consider a program as a relation on the set of its possible states. The relational equations describing the behavior of programs can be object level, i.e., they refer to states and values of variables, or they can be relation level, i.e., the constants and variables in the equations range over relations. Relation level work using binary
Jules Desharnais, Nazim H. Madhavji
openaire +2 more sources
It is common to consider a program as a relation on the set of its possible states. The relational equations describing the behavior of programs can be object level, i.e., they refer to states and values of variables, or they can be relation level, i.e., the constants and variables in the equations range over relations. Relation level work using binary
Jules Desharnais, Nazim H. Madhavji
openaire +2 more sources
A Taxonomy of Semantic Relations
1991Relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought. Aristotle explained the sequence of ideas in recall in terms of contiguity, similarity, and contrast (Aristotle, 1928–1952, Chap. 2). John Locke used relations between ideas to account for the formation of complex ideas from simple ones and for the ability to reason (Rapaport, 1974, pp.
Roger Chaffin +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Transitivity in semantic relation learning
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering(NLPKE-2010), 2010Text understanding models exploit semantic networks of words as basic components. Automatically enriching and expanding these resources is then an important challenge for NLP. Existing models for enriching semantic resources based on lexical-syntactic patterns make little use of structural properties of target semantic relations.
Fallucchi, F, ZANZOTTO, FABIO MASSIMO
openaire +2 more sources