Results 111 to 120 of about 31,478 (165)
Hierarchical Prototype Alignment for Video Temporal Grounding. [PDF]
Tian Y, Guo X, Wang J, Zhao Y, Li B.
europepmc +1 more source
Research on plant knowledge graph reasoning based on dual-channel attention and topological perception. [PDF]
Wang S, Su Y, Gao H.
europepmc +1 more source
Mine intelligent ventilation event capture and scheme reasoning knowledge base. [PDF]
Gong C +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Children Sustain Their Attention on Spatial Scenes When Planning to Describe Spatial Relations Multimodally in Speech and Gesture. [PDF]
Ünal E, Karadöller DZ, Özyürek A.
europepmc +1 more source
WoR<sup>+</sup> Ontology: Modeling Data and Services in Web Connected Environments. [PDF]
Kallab L, Salameh K, Chbeir R.
europepmc +1 more source
The speaker’s lexical-semantic network in the tip of the tongue state
Couvreu M, Laganaro M.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
A Semantics for Means-end Relations
Synthese, 2006zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Hughes, J. (author) +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
1988
It is common to consider a program as a relation on the set of its possible states. The relational equations describing the behavior of programs can be object level, i.e., they refer to states and values of variables, or they can be relation level, i.e., the constants and variables in the equations range over relations. Relation level work using binary
Jules Desharnais, Nazim H. Madhavji
openaire +1 more source
It is common to consider a program as a relation on the set of its possible states. The relational equations describing the behavior of programs can be object level, i.e., they refer to states and values of variables, or they can be relation level, i.e., the constants and variables in the equations range over relations. Relation level work using binary
Jules Desharnais, Nazim H. Madhavji
openaire +1 more source

