Results 301 to 310 of about 10,843,502 (349)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Significance
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2008Unfortunately, the data were statistically nonsignificant due to insufficient power and poor experimental design. Conversely, many large clinical trials obtain a high level of statistical significance with miniscule differences between groups, which are completely clinically irrelevant. However, with proper marketing, billions can be made from results
Timothy T, Houle, David A, Stump
openaire +2 more sources
The significance of 'no significant difference'
Acta Radiologica, 1990It is generally accepted that patients experience less discomfort with low osmolality contrast media (LOM) than with high osmolar media (HOM). Hard statistical facts from so called ‘high quality’ controlled trials, proving that more significant reactions such as vomiting, hives, urticaria or anaphylactic complications also are less common with LOM are,
J, Brismar, B, Jacobsson
openaire +2 more sources
Is Statistical Significance Always Significant?
Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 2005One way in which we learn new information is to read the medical literature. Whether or not we do primary research, it is important to be able to read literature in a critical fashion. A seemingly simple concept in reading is to interpret p values. For most of us, if we find a p value that is <.05, we take the conclusion to heart and quote it at ...
openaire +2 more sources
The significance of statistical significance
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 1997Currently, much nursing practice is based on limited evidence, for example, small-scale research, case studies and clinical experience. In a mature science this would be undesirable, but nursing is in the early stages of development as a science, and many of its practices depend on relatively informal knowledge.
openaire +3 more sources
British Dental Journal, 1989
Simple methods of determining whether the difference between a sample mean and a given standard value is likely to be due only to sampling error, or to be real and/or of practical importance, are described. The use of the null hypothesis and of standard normal deviates is discussed, and examples are provided to illustrate the points made.
J S, Bulman, J F, Osborn
openaire +2 more sources
Simple methods of determining whether the difference between a sample mean and a given standard value is likely to be due only to sampling error, or to be real and/or of practical importance, are described. The use of the null hypothesis and of standard normal deviates is discussed, and examples are provided to illustrate the points made.
J S, Bulman, J F, Osborn
openaire +2 more sources
Significant or Not Significant
Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1963(1963). Significant or Not Significant. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation: Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 239-242.
Dale O. Nelson, Rex L. Hurst
openaire +1 more source
Signifying significant significance.
American Psychologist, 1972Jerold D. Bozarth, Ralph R. Roberts
openaire +2 more sources
Significant gains, significant disputes, significant techniques
2022Clive Jenkins, Barrie Sherman
openaire +1 more source
Significance, non-significance — who has found significance?
Pain, 1993Mark A, Slater +2 more
openaire +2 more sources