Results 211 to 220 of about 643,987 (256)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A Priori Probability Effects on Simple Reaction Time
Journal of Motor Behavior, 1975Three factors - immediate foreperiod (1.0 and 4.0 sec), previous foreperiod (1.0 and 4.0 sec) and a priori probability (0.8 and 0.2) - were employed in a variable foreperiod simple RT design. The possibility was examined that a priori probability functioned independently of the previous foreperiod effect, an hypothesis advanced as an explanation for ...
E, Buckolz, R, Wilberg
openaire +2 more sources
Uncertainty, Timekeeping, and Simple Reaction Time
Journal of Motor Behavior, 1970Implications of the hypothesis that effects on simple RT of event and time uncertainty are due to S's unwillingness to prepare for an unlikely event were tested. In 2 experiments, RT was compared for the foreperiod method and the new transit-signal method. Alternative hypotheses based on faulty reinstatement of foreperiods were invalidated. The inverse
openaire +2 more sources
Spectral loudness summation and simple reaction time
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004The present study evaluates the relation between loudness and simple reaction time (RT). Loudness matches between a narrowband noise (125 Hz wide) and a broadband noise (1500 Hz) were made at levels from near threshold to near 100 dB SPL. Over a similarly wide range of levels, RT to each of the noise bands was also measured.
Eva, Wagner +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Loudness and Simple Reaction Time′
British Journal of Audiology, 1972This paper is an attempt to examine two major problem areas in accounting for the reason why people respond more rapidly to loud signals than to quiet ones. The first area is concerned with the experimentally variable magnitude of the effect, and three models are discussed.
openaire +1 more source
Shadowed and simple reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989Stutterers may experience difficulties in preparing and executing responses. This study investigated these possibilities as well as the possibility that stutterers may experience difficulty in the selection of responses. Two reaction-time tasks were investigated: a shadowing response in which speakers exactly repeated vowel sequences they heard, and a ...
D C, Harbison, R J, Porter, E A, Tobey
openaire +2 more sources
The Stability of the Simple Reaction Time
2006Some of the most widely used criterion variables in psychology are simple and choice reaction time. While stability of choice reaction time as a dependent variable seems to be investigated by researchers, no such data could be found for simple reaction time measurements.
Rebić, Veseljka +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Some Experiments on Simple and Choice Reaction Time.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967Abstract : The report concerns four problems on simple and choice reaction time (RT). First, in Experiments 1 and 2, the suthors examine the role of time estimation in the manipulation of responses in simple reaction time experiments by means of payoffs and information feedback.
J G, Snodgrass, R D, Luce, E, Galanter
openaire +2 more sources
Simple apparatus for generating reaction time histograms
Physiology & Behavior, 1978Abstract Human reaction times (RT) to sensory stimuli show variations that cannot be explained by peripheral or central neural processes. The statistical distribution of RT's for a given stimulus and differences in RT distributions for different stimuli seem to have received little attention. This report describes a simple apparatus for generating RT
openaire +2 more sources
Representative Simple Reaction and Movement Time Scores
Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1976(1976). Representative Simple Reaction and Movement Time Scores. Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation: Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 855-856.
K M, Haywood, J B, Teeple
openaire +2 more sources
Effects of smoking on simple and choice reaction time
Psychopharmacology, 1994Twenty-nine subjects performed a reaction time task with four levels of choice-task complexity under non-smoking, sham smoking, and low, medium and high nicotine cigarette conditions. Nicotine reduced decision time, while sham smoking increased decision time. This effect was independent of subjects' habitual levels of cigarette consumption.
T, Bates +3 more
openaire +2 more sources

