Results 11 to 20 of about 13,568,267 (230)

No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect

open access: yesActa Psychologica, 2022
The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect (i.e., faster left/right sided responses to small/large magnitude numbers, respectively) is considered to be strong evidence for the link between numbers and space.
Mateusz Hohol   +2 more
doaj   +6 more sources

The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage

open access: yesActa Psychologica, 2021
The dimensional overlap (DO) theory categorizes various stimulus-response compatible effects (e.g., the manual Stroop, Simon, and SNARC effects) into two main types: stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) dimensional overlap effects. The S-S
Lizhu Yan   +4 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters [PDF]

open access: yesFrontiers in Psychology, 2011
A structural representation of the hand embedding information about the identity and relative position of fingers is necessary to counting routines. It may also support associations between numbers and allocentric spatial codes that predictably interact ...
Marianna eRiello, Elena eRusconi
doaj   +6 more sources

Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames. [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2020
Human adults are faster to respond to small/large numerals with their left/right hand when they judge the parity of numerals, which is known as the SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) effect.
Shuyuan Yu   +9 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response. [PDF]

open access: yesQ J Exp Psychol (Hove), 2022
The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right.
Galarraga DB, Pratt J, Cochrane BA.
europepmc   +2 more sources

On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect [PDF]

open access: yesFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
About twenty years ago, Dehaene et al. (1993) asked participants to perform a parity task twice, each time with a different mapping of response hand to parity value. The participants responded with a key-press and latency served as the dependent variable. The two mappings are depicted in Panel (A) of Figure ​Figure1.1.
Joseph eTzelgov   +5 more
doaj   +6 more sources

The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach. [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2014
Access to mental representations of smaller vs. larger number symbols is associated with leftward vs. rightward spatial locations, as represented on a number line. The well-replicated SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes) reveals
Arnaud Viarouge   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Magnitude and Order are Both Relevant in SNARC and SNARC‐like Effects: A Commentary on Casasanto and Pitt (2019) [PDF]

open access: yesCognitive Science, 2021
AbstractIn a recent paper by Casasanto and Pitt (2019), the authors addressed a debate regarding the role of order and magnitude in SNARC and SNARC‐like effects. Their position is that all these effects can be explained by order, while magnitude could only account for a subset of evidence.
Prpic V.   +3 more
openaire   +4 more sources

The SNARC Effect in Chinese Numerals: Do Visual Properties of Characters and Hand Signs Influence Number Processing? [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2016
The SNARC effect refers to an association of numbers and spatial properties of responses that is commonly thought to be amodal and independent of stimulus notation.
Karl K Kopiske   +7 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Is Social Categorization Spatially Organized in a “Mental Line”? Empirical Evidences for Spatial Bias in Intergroup Differentiation [PDF]

open access: yesFrontiers in Psychology, 2018
Social categorization is the differentiation between the self and others and between one’s own group and other groups and it is such a natural and spontaneous process that often we are not aware of it.
Fabio Presaghi, Marika Rullo
doaj   +12 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy