No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect [PDF]
The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect (i.e., faster left/right sided responses to small/large magnitude numbers, respectively) is considered to be strong evidence for the link between numbers and space.
Mateusz Hohol +2 more
doaj +14 more sources
The influence of semantics and numerical representation on the SNARC effect [PDF]
World semantics refers to how individuals comprehend and ascribe meaning to phenomena within specific sociocultural and environmental contexts. And it significantly influences how people conceptualize numerical properties, such as quantity (“how many ...
Tinghu Kang +4 more
doaj +4 more sources
The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage
The dimensional overlap (DO) theory categorizes various stimulus-response compatible effects (e.g., the manual Stroop, Simon, and SNARC effects) into two main types: stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) dimensional overlap effects. The S-S
Lizhu Yan +4 more
doaj +4 more sources
Magnitude and Order are Both Relevant in SNARC and SNARC‐like Effects: A Commentary on Casasanto and Pitt (2019) [PDF]
Abstract In a recent paper by Casasanto and Pitt (2019), the authors addressed a debate regarding the role of order and magnitude in SNARC and SNARC‐like effects. Their position is that all these effects can be explained by order, while magnitude could only account for a subset of evidence. Although we agree that order can probably explain the majority
Valter Prpic +2 more
exaly +5 more sources
The role of cognitive control in the interaction of the SNARC and MARC effects [PDF]
Many studies have identified two types of spatial congruency effects in number parity judgment tasks: the SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes), related to numerical magnitude, and the MARC effect (Linguistic Markedness ...
Dandan Zhou, Yu Zhao, Kemeng Qu, Qi Chen
doaj +4 more sources
On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect [PDF]
About twenty years ago, Dehaene et al. (1993) asked participants to perform a parity task twice, each time with a different mapping of response hand to parity value. The participants responded with a key-press and latency served as the dependent variable. The two mappings are depicted in Panel (A) of Figure Figure1.1.
Joseph eTzelgov +5 more
doaj +6 more sources
The SNARC effect is not a unitary phenomenon [PDF]
Models of the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect-faster responses to small numbers using left effectors, and the converse for large numbers-diverge substantially in localizing the root cause of this effect along the numbers ...
Simone Cutini +2 more
core +4 more sources
Two processing stages of the SNARC effect
The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect showed that small/large numbers represented in the left/right space facilitated left/right responses, respectively.
Fu, Shimin +4 more
core +3 more sources
Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. [PDF]
The SNARC (spatial numerical associations of response codes) effect reflects the tendency to respond faster with the left hand to relatively small numbers and with the right hand to relatively large numbers (S. Dehaene, S. Bossini, & P.
Gevers, Wim +4 more
core +3 more sources
Measuring SNARC effect: different task setups reveal divergent spatial-numerical associations [PDF]
Spatial-Numerical Associations (SNAs) reflect the cognitive link between numerical magnitude and spatial orientation. While the SNARC effect, faster-left responses for small numbers and right responses for large ones, is robust in Western populations ...
Merve Bulut +5 more
doaj +2 more sources

