Results 261 to 270 of about 499,189 (352)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Specialties and the specialty boards
The Laryngoscope, 1976AbstractAs specialism has developed in the United States, multiple specialty societies and specialty boards have been created. Although they, in a very realistic fashion, have established the general standards for the delivery of specialty care and for graduate medical education, they, with other national medical organizations such as the American ...
W. Holden
semanticscholar +3 more sources
Can specialty boards respond to change?
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1971Can the specialty boards respond to change? A brief review of the history of the development of the specialty board system in the United States reveals that its birth and evolution was, and is, a response to the need for change.
A. Faulconer
semanticscholar +4 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
UP TO NOW, no one has devised a scientific method to evaluate the quality of medical education. One reason for the origin of specialty boards in the United States was because of concern about this problem.
C. Aring
semanticscholar +5 more sources
UP TO NOW, no one has devised a scientific method to evaluate the quality of medical education. One reason for the origin of specialty boards in the United States was because of concern about this problem.
C. Aring
semanticscholar +5 more sources
Relevant recertification—a problem for specialty boards
American Journal of Surgery, 2008 Jeffrey S. Freed
openalex +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
To the Editor.— The commentary, "Whither the Specialty Boards?" (235:1849, 1976), and the editorial by Stewart Wolf, MD (235:1883, 1976), deserves serious consideration by the governing bodies of the specialty boards. The initial reasons for the boards were very high-minded and rendered them effective in serving a great and useful purpose for medicine
openaire +4 more sources
To the Editor.— The commentary, "Whither the Specialty Boards?" (235:1849, 1976), and the editorial by Stewart Wolf, MD (235:1883, 1976), deserves serious consideration by the governing bodies of the specialty boards. The initial reasons for the boards were very high-minded and rendered them effective in serving a great and useful purpose for medicine
openaire +4 more sources
APPROVED EXAMINING BOARDS IN MEDICAL SPECIALTIES
Journal of the American Medical Association, 1952The Advisory Board for Medical Specialties was organized in 1933-1934 to coordinate graduate medical education and certification of medical specialists in the United States and Canada. A few specialty boards had been functioning actively and successfully for a number of years prior to the organization of the Advisory Board for Medical Specialties ...
openaire +5 more sources
, 1941
It is commonly said, and with some truth, that the pathologist has the last word as to clinical diagnosis. This is not because he has superior intelligence but simply because he has direct access to the material, in contrast to the clinician, who thumps,
H. T. Karsner
semanticscholar +1 more source
It is commonly said, and with some truth, that the pathologist has the last word as to clinical diagnosis. This is not because he has superior intelligence but simply because he has direct access to the material, in contrast to the clinician, who thumps,
H. T. Karsner
semanticscholar +1 more source