Results 281 to 290 of about 501,439 (377)
"Proclaim (Best Available) Truth From the Rooftops": A Community Doc's Alternate View on Dissemination & Implementation of AO Spine/Praxis' 2024 Acute Spinal Cord Injury Guidelines. [PDF]
Global Spine JArvinte C.
europepmc +1 more source
The Founding of the Specialty Boards [PDF]
Anesthesiology, 1981 DAVID M. LITTLE
semanticscholar +5 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Specialties and the specialty boards
The Laryngoscope, 1976AbstractAs specialism has developed in the United States, multiple specialty societies and specialty boards have been created. Although they, in a very realistic fashion, have established the general standards for the delivery of specialty care and for graduate medical education, they, with other national medical organizations such as the American ...
W. Holden
openaire +3 more sources
Can Specialty Boards Respond to Change?
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1971Can the specialty boards respond to change? A brief review of the history of the development of the specialty board system in the United States reveals that its birth and evolution was, and is, a response to the need for change. Around the turn of the century the growth of new knowledge pertinent to the practice of medicine had reached a pace which ...
A. Faulconer
openaire +4 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
UP TO NOW, no one has devised a scientific method to evaluate the quality of medical education. One reason for the origin of specialty boards in the United States was because of concern about this problem. Standards of measurement were derived for the average physician and, after examination, those judged qualified were certified.
C. Aring
openaire +5 more sources
UP TO NOW, no one has devised a scientific method to evaluate the quality of medical education. One reason for the origin of specialty boards in the United States was because of concern about this problem. Standards of measurement were derived for the average physician and, after examination, those judged qualified were certified.
C. Aring
openaire +5 more sources
Relevant recertification—a problem for specialty boards
American Journal of Surgery, 2008 Jeffrey S. Freed
openalex +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
To the Editor.— The commentary, "Whither the Specialty Boards?" (235:1849, 1976), and the editorial by Stewart Wolf, MD (235:1883, 1976), deserves serious consideration by the governing bodies of the specialty boards. The initial reasons for the boards were very high-minded and rendered them effective in serving a great and useful purpose for medicine
openaire +4 more sources
To the Editor.— The commentary, "Whither the Specialty Boards?" (235:1849, 1976), and the editorial by Stewart Wolf, MD (235:1883, 1976), deserves serious consideration by the governing bodies of the specialty boards. The initial reasons for the boards were very high-minded and rendered them effective in serving a great and useful purpose for medicine
openaire +4 more sources