Results 121 to 130 of about 217,358 (166)

Speech discrimination in automated diagnostic hearing test

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
Method and system are disclosed for automated testing of a patient's hearing. The automated hearing test allows the patient to quickly and accurately test his own hearing with minimal or no assistance from an audiologist or other hearing health professionals. The test prompts and instructs the patient for inputs and responses as needed as needed.
openaire   +1 more source

Standard Error Measurement in Speech Discrimination Testing

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971
Speech discrimination data obtained by sequential testing with 12 normal-hearing listeners were described by Bode and Carhart at the 80th Meeting of the Society in Houston [J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 49, 95(A) (1971)]. Group results showed that sequential testing provided discrimination functions essentially identical to those measured by conventional ...
openaire   +1 more source

A Test for Speech Discrimination Composed of CNC Monosyllabic Words

Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963
In an attenlpt to develop two highly equivalent forms of a test of phonemic discrimination, two lists, each composed of 50 CNC monosyllabic words and conforming to the phonemic balance favored by Lehiste and Peterson (1959), were recorded on magnetic tape in six different word orders. These lists, designated as N. U. Auditory Test No.
R, CARHART, T W, TILLMAN, L, WILBER
openaire   +2 more sources

A Phonemic Analysis of Half-List Speech Discrimination Tests

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1963
The results of a phonemic analysis of the words in the W-22 test and PB test lists 7, 8, 9, and 10 are reported.
openaire   +2 more sources

Refinement Of Selected Speech Discrimination Tests.

1964
PhD ; Theater ; University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies ; http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/183817/2/6505272 ...
openaire   +2 more sources

A second look at tests of speech-sound discrimination

Journal of Communication Disorders, 1984
This study is an extension of an earlier study conducted by Bountress and Laderberg (1981), which compared the performances of a group of children on two tests of speech-sound discrimination, the Wepman test and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock test. The present study consisted of two treatments: The dual administration of the Boston University Speech Sound ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Reliability of Voice Tests of Speech Discrimination

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1966
Three randomizations of a list of twenty-five words were recorded by a single talker on separate days and under identical conditions. One of the recordings was rerecorded three times and these dubbings were acoustically corrected, cut, and spliced into the three different orders. Two groups of twelve subjects each were tested. One group listened to the
openaire   +1 more source

The effect of test difficulty on the sensitivity of speech discrimination tests

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983
The sensitivity of speech discrimination tests is defined as being large if a small change in experimental conditions causes a large and repeatable change in test score. The aim of this paper is to investigate ways by which test sensitivity can be maximized.
openaire   +2 more sources

Further Investigation of Vowel Items in Multiple-Choice Speech Discrimination Testing

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
A list of 25 vowel-test items employing a multiple-choice (or closed-set) response system was presented to 94 patients with hearing impairments and 10 with normal hearing listening through a low-pass filter. The items had been demonstrated empirically to be the most difficult of 288 similarly constructed items.
E, Owens, M, Benedict, E D, Schubert
openaire   +2 more sources

Writedown Versus Talkback Scoring and Scoring Bias in Speech Discrimination Testing

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970
Writedown and talkback responses to 500 Hz low-pass filtered CID W-22 words were obtained from eight listeners, and their talkback responses were scored by eight experienced and eight inexperienced examiners. Four of the experienced and four of the inexperienced examiners monitored at 70 dB SPL; four experienced and four inexperienced examiners ...
D A, Nelson, J B, Chaiklin
openaire   +2 more sources