Results 291 to 300 of about 217,340 (350)

A Picture-Type Speech Sound Discrimination Test

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1953
Wilbert Pronovost, Charles Dumbleton
openalex   +3 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Factors Affecting Speech Discrimination Test Difficulty

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1969
Changes in item and overall test difficulty of speech discrimination and intelligibility tests were examined as a function of: carrier phrase, talker, reutterances by a talker, and level of accompanying noise. The results indicate that all of these variables must be considered in test development. Only the actual recordings of the spoken lists of words
E J, Kreul, D W, Bell, J C, Nixon
openaire   +2 more sources

A computerized adaptive testing system for speech  discrimination measurement: The Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
A computerized, adaptive test-delivery system for the measurement of speech discrimination, the Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test, is described and evaluated. Using a modified discrimination task, the testing system draws on a pool of 130 items spanning a broad range of difficulty to estimate an examinee’s location along an underlying continuum ...
J, Bochner, W, Garrison, L, Palmer, D, MacKenzie, A, Braveman   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Group speech sound discrimination testing

Journal of Communication Disorders, 1968
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present a controlled method of group testing of speech sound discrimination which would be expedient for the researcher and clinician. Three hundred one first graders between six years, six months and seven years, six months were administered the 50-item Templin Speech Sound Discrimination Test.
Joan Rechner, Betty Ann Wilson
openaire   +1 more source

An Item-Difficulty Based Speech Discrimination Test

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
In an attempt to improve the differentiating ability of monosyllabic speech discrimination tests, two equivalent, 25-word test recordings with rectilinear distributions of item difficulty were constructed from W-22 Hirsh recordings. These lists and selected half lists of the standard W-22 recordings were then presented to 40 ears of listeners with ...
R H, Margolis, J P, Millin
openaire   +2 more sources

Variables Influencing Performance on Speech-Sound Discrimination Tests

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974
Stimulus items were presented in three different contexts and under two different listening conditions to a total of 72 nursery, kindergarten, and first-grade children divided into equally sized groups on the basis of age. Results indicated that both the context of stimulus item presentation and the presence of background noise affected accuracy of ...
A H, Schwartz, R, Goldman
openaire   +2 more sources

On Phonemic Analysis of Speech Discrimination Tests

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1964
Recent misinterpretations of split-list discrimination test research: Grubb, Patti, A phonetic analysis of half-list speech discrimination tests. J. Speech Hearing Res., 6, 271‰275 (1963) and Grubb, Patti, Some considerations in the use of half-list speech discrimination test. J. Speech Hearing Res., 6, 294‰297 (1963) are discussed.
openaire   +2 more sources

A Proposed Clinical Test of Speech Discrimination

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1968
The Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) has been adapted to the needs of the clinical audiologist. Tape recordings of three speakers, one female and two males, were made, evaluated, and assembled in a format suitable for use as a clinical tool. Special attention was given to ensure an appropriate carrier phrase, consistent timing sequences, well-controlled ...
E. James Kreul, James C. Nixon, Karl D. Kryter, Donald W. Bell, Janna S. Lang, Earl D. Schubert   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Stimulus-alternation preference procedure to test infant speech discrimination

Infant Behavior and Development, 1998
CatherineT. Best, Cathleen Jones
openalex   +2 more sources

Chapter VIII: Clinical Evaluation of the Speech Discrimination Test

Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1954

openalex   +2 more sources