Results 321 to 330 of about 623,333 (376)

A PHONEMIC ANALYSIS OF HALF-LIST SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1963
The results of a phonemic analysis of the words in the W-22 test and PB test lists 7, 8, 9, and 10 are reported.
P. Grubb
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

Variables influencing performance on speech-sound discrimination tests.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974
Stimulus items were presented in three different contexts and under two different listening conditions to a total of 72 nursery, kindergarten, and first-grade children divided into equally sized gr...
A. Schwartz, R. Goldman
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

An item-difficulty based speech discrimination test.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971
In an attempt to improve the differentiating ability of monosyllabic speech discrimination tests, two equivalent, 25-word test recordings with rectilinear distributions of item difficulty were cons...
R. Margolis, J. P. Millin
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

Current Developments in Auditory Speech Discrimination Tests for the Profoundly Deaf at NTID

American Annals of the Deaf, 1980
Two newly developed and three existing auditory speech discrimination tests were given to a group of 35 NTID students representing the five NTID functional profiles (categories) of hearing discrimination ability. Approximately half of the students scored zero on the CID W-22 word test and CID (CHABA) sentences and from just above chance to 100% on a ...
J. Webster, John C. Noreen P. O'Shea
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

The Development of Constant Items for Speech Discrimination Testing

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1968
Subjects were English-speaking adults with hearing impairment. Etiology of hearing loss did not enter into selection. Consonant errors were observed on speech discrimination test lists employing a closed-set response system. Fifteen subjects were employed for the first list and 20 each for the remaining four lists, with an occasional subject serving in
Elmer Owens, Earl D. Schubert
openalex   +4 more sources

A second look at tests of speech-sound discrimination.

Journal of Communication Disorders, 1984
This study is an extension of an earlier study conducted by Bountress and Laderberg (1981), which compared the performances of a group of children on two tests of speech-sound discrimination, the Wepman test and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock test. The present study consisted of two treatments: The dual administration of the Boston University Speech Sound ...
N. Bountress
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

A comparison of two tests of speech-sound discrimination.

Journal of Communication Disorders, 1981
This study was conducted for the purpose of comparing two tests of speech-sound discrimination which are commonly used by speech-language clinicians, the Wepman and Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock. In particular, it was the purpose of the study to ascertain whether the tests were significantly comparable measures of speech-sound discrimination.
N. Bountress, C. M. Laderberg
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Routine speech discrimination tests

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1972
A. Kerr, G. Smyth
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

Speech-Sound Discrimination Ability on Linguistically Unbiased Tests

Exceptional Children, 1976
Traditional testing practices have been considered by some educators as discriminatory against minority groups. These practices are thought to have led to a disproportionate number of black and Spanish speaking children being placed in special classes as a result of their “poor performance” on tests standardized on white, middle class populations and ...
D. Bryen
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

A Review of Tests of Speech Discrimination

Seminars in Hearing, 1983
C. Brewer, D. Resnick
semanticscholar   +3 more sources