Results 41 to 50 of about 104 (86)
Nominal Constructions and Split Ergativity in Chol (Mayan)
Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2014 openaire +2 more sources
Split Ergativity : A ”Categories and Transformations” Approach
Split Ergativity : A ”Categories and Transformations” Approachopenaire
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Split ergativity and transitivity in Chol
Lingua, 2012Abstract In this paper I examine two types of splits in the otherwise ergative-absolutive person marking system of Chol Mayan. First, Chol shows what is known as a “split-S” system: subjects of unergatives pattern as transitive subjects (ergative), while subjects of unaccusatives pattern as transitive objects (absolutive) ( Gutierrez Sanchez, 2004 ).
Jessica Coon
exaly +2 more sources
Split ergativity based on nominal type
Lingua, 2014This paper argues that split ergativity based on nominal type is a morphological phenomenon, not a syntactic one. We use three tests to identify the source of this type of split ergativity as morphological syncretism: (i) case agreement, (ii) syntactic ergativity, (iii) coordination.
Julie Anne Legate
exaly +2 more sources
Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2006Itziar Laka
exaly +2 more sources
Diachronica, 2021
AbstractThis paper reassesses the rise of ergative alignment in Anatolian and Indo-Aryan, two branches of the Indo-European linguistic family. Both of these branches acquire split-ergative morphosyntax in the course of their history but via different grammaticalization paths and with different results.
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis paper reassesses the rise of ergative alignment in Anatolian and Indo-Aryan, two branches of the Indo-European linguistic family. Both of these branches acquire split-ergative morphosyntax in the course of their history but via different grammaticalization paths and with different results.
openaire +1 more source