Results 191 to 200 of about 10,141 (239)

Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain-OCT and standard automated perimetry

, 2013
Fabrício Reis Silva
openalex   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Current Practice with Standard Automated Perimetry

Seminars in Ophthalmology, 2000
This article reviews standard visual field testing. The authors discuss the psychophysics involved in the design of the perimeter and the parameters used to test visual field sensitivity. The authors also explain normal and pathological sensitivity across the visual field, the patient and testing conditions that influence visual field results, and the ...
C F, Bosworth, P A, Sample, C A, Johnson, R N, Weinreb   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Relationship between HEP perimetry and standard automated perimetry

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2010
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the relationship between Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) performed with Humphrey perimeter (Carl Zeiss Meditec, EEUU) and a new white‐white perimetry tested with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP, Heidelberg Engineering, Alemania).
L GIL ARRIBAS, P CALVO, A FERRERAS, I ALTEMIR, S OTIN, S FERNANDEZ, L PABLO JULVEZ, I FUERTES   +7 more
openaire   +1 more source

Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2005
AbstractThe literature suggests that visual field defects may be more common in people who experience migraine. The Humphrey frequency doubling (FDT) visual field instrument selectively examines the magnocellular visual pathway, but has not previously been used to investigate visual function in migraine.
Deacon E, Harle, Bruce J W, Evans
openaire   +2 more sources

Rarebit Perimetry for Bedside Testing: Comparison With Standard Automated Perimetry

Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 2010
Rarebit perimetry (RBP), a technique developed for the detection of early damage to the afferent visual system, has not been extensively tested at the bedside. This study was designed to test the feasibility of bedside testing with RBP in comparison with standard automated perimetry (SAP) performed in the clinic.We tested 29 eyes of 15 subjects ...
Samuel K, Steven Houston, Eric D, Weber, Sebastian F, Koga, Steven A, Newman   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Reading a standard automated perimetry printout

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2022
AbstractInterpreting the results of standard automated perimetry (SAP) is not difficult but a systematic approach is pivotal. In this part of the course we address the following topics: Which test to choose in which situation? Is the test reliable? What are common artefacts and how do you recognize them?
openaire   +1 more source

Relationship between flicker FDF perimetry and standard automated perimetry

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2010
Abstract Purpose To compare the main indices of flicker FDF perimetry (FDF, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) with standard automated perimetry (SAP). Methods Twenty healthy subjects and twenty‐three glaucoma patients were prospectively and consecutively selected.
P CALVO PEREZ, L GIL‐ARRIBAS, A FERRERAS, S OTIN, I ALTEMIR, S FERNANDEZ, L PABLO JULVEZ, I FUERTES   +7 more
openaire   +1 more source

Frequency-Doubling Perimetry: Comparison With Standard Automated Perimetry to Detect Glaucoma

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007
To compare second generation frequency-doubling perimetry (FDP) with standard automated perimetry (SAP) to detect glaucomatous visual field abnormalities.Prospective, cross-sectional, controlled observational study.Fifty eyes of 50 patients with glaucoma with confirmed SAP visual field abnormalities and 42 eyes from 42 normal control subjects were ...
Narakorn, Leeprechanon, Annette, Giangiacomo, Hector, Fontana, Douglas, Hoffman, Joseph, Caprioli   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources