Results 101 to 110 of about 527,833 (164)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 2014
TASH’s historic commitment to advocacy and science has enabled it to be a trusted voice for people with severe disabilities and their families. We review recent developments in the controversy over facilitated communication (FC) in light of major contextual continuities and changes in the past two decades.
George H. S. Singer +3 more
openaire +1 more source
TASH’s historic commitment to advocacy and science has enabled it to be a trusted voice for people with severe disabilities and their families. We review recent developments in the controversy over facilitated communication (FC) in light of major contextual continuities and changes in the past two decades.
George H. S. Singer +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Standards of Proof, Standards of Practice, and Proof of Standards: A Tale of Two Trials
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Chang et al and Witzig et al report two randomized controlled trials evaluating the role of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) for the management of anemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
openaire +1 more source
Standard of proof should not be lowered
Veterinary Record, 2020It was disappointing to read the news article ‘Standard of proof for disciplinaries could change’ ( VR , 18 January 2020, vol 186, p 43). As a former member of the RCVS Disciplinary and Preliminary Investigation Committees I have deep concerns about changing the standard of proof from the current ‘so as to be sure’ to the civil standard ‘on balance of ...
openaire +2 more sources
2017
When can we consider that an attack is attributed, if attribution is not dependent on court proceedings? Do we need "appropriate" standards for the attribution of cyber attacks? What would such standards look like? This chapter starts by noting that there is a mismatch between how attribution functions, and how the law operates.
openaire +1 more source
When can we consider that an attack is attributed, if attribution is not dependent on court proceedings? Do we need "appropriate" standards for the attribution of cyber attacks? What would such standards look like? This chapter starts by noting that there is a mismatch between how attribution functions, and how the law operates.
openaire +1 more source