Results 231 to 240 of about 2,461,826 (288)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2017
When can we consider that an attack is attributed, if attribution is not dependent on court proceedings? Do we need "appropriate" standards for the attribution of cyber attacks? What would such standards look like? This chapter starts by noting that there is a mismatch between how attribution functions, and how the law operates.
openaire +1 more source
When can we consider that an attack is attributed, if attribution is not dependent on court proceedings? Do we need "appropriate" standards for the attribution of cyber attacks? What would such standards look like? This chapter starts by noting that there is a mismatch between how attribution functions, and how the law operates.
openaire +1 more source
2019
Abstract This chapter elaborates on the civil standard of proof universally applied by all tribunals and committees in professional conduct proceedings. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service transitioned arrangements for the tribunal to apply the civil standard concerning allegations ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This chapter elaborates on the civil standard of proof universally applied by all tribunals and committees in professional conduct proceedings. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service transitioned arrangements for the tribunal to apply the civil standard concerning allegations ...
openaire +1 more source
Standard of proof at RCVS disciplinary hearings
Veterinary Record, 2020We are sure that the profession is grateful to RCVS president, Niall Connell, for the letter clarifying the potential changes to the its disciplinary process ( VR , 1 February 2020, vol 186, p 126), and has expressed a collective sigh of relief that no change in the standard of proof for disciplinary hearings is imminent.
Richard, Stephenson +10 more
openaire +2 more sources
2003
Abstract If the conclusion to which you are conducted be that there is that degree of certainty in the case which you would act upon in your own grave and important concerns, that is the degree of certainty which the law requires and which will justify you in returning a verdict of guilty.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract If the conclusion to which you are conducted be that there is that degree of certainty in the case which you would act upon in your own grave and important concerns, that is the degree of certainty which the law requires and which will justify you in returning a verdict of guilty.
openaire +1 more source
Standard of proof should not be lowered
Veterinary Record, 2020It was disappointing to read the news article ‘Standard of proof for disciplinaries could change’ ( VR , 18 January 2020, vol 186, p 43). As a former member of the RCVS Disciplinary and Preliminary Investigation Committees I have deep concerns about changing the standard of proof from the current ‘so as to be sure’ to the civil standard ‘on balance of ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Standards of Judicial Proof
2018Late night on 5th April 1989, on the Youyi Forest Farm of Yichun City in Heilongjiang Province, a forest-fire ranger, Guan Chuansheng, was stabbed to death with a knife. During the crime-scene investigation, it was discovered that the back center of the victim’s overcoat had been cut, and that a corresponding cut in the body had corner angles ...
openaire +1 more source
Rethinking the Standards of Proof
The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2003A recent article entitled A Comparative View of Standards of Proof by Kevin Clermont and Emily Sherwin' has the merit of discussing an issue that is not frequently analyzed and of proposing some interesting remarks about several complex and puzzling topics.
openaire +1 more source
Correlation between Standards of Proof and Burden of Proof
Bulletin of Liberal Arts UniversityThe article presents an in-depth analysis of the correlation between standards and the burden of proof in Russian civil procedure. The author examines the principal considerations and challenges associated with the application and interpretation of these concepts in contemporary judicial practice and doctrine.
openaire +1 more source
2019
Abstract This chapter examines issues of burden and standard of proof that arise in competition proceedings. It first provides an overview of relevant terminology such as burden, legal burden, evidential burden, and standard of proof before discussing the burden of proof, presumption, and standard of proof with regard to civil claims and
Mark Brealey, Kyla George
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This chapter examines issues of burden and standard of proof that arise in competition proceedings. It first provides an overview of relevant terminology such as burden, legal burden, evidential burden, and standard of proof before discussing the burden of proof, presumption, and standard of proof with regard to civil claims and
Mark Brealey, Kyla George
openaire +1 more source