Results 141 to 150 of about 4,206 (182)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Abstract Although parents or the State ought never to permit certain evils, God may be justified in permitting them, since he has far greater rights over us, and far greater power to compensate us. The difference between ‘horrendous’ and ‘significant’ evils is a matter of degree.
exaly +2 more sources
exaly +2 more sources
A Naturalistic Theodicy for Sterba’s Problem of Natural Evil
SophiaDwayne Moore
exaly +2 more sources
Sterba on Amoralism and Begging the Question
Philosophical Inquiries, 2013While sympathetic to Sterba’s equalitarian convictions, Lippert-Rasmussen attacks that Sterba’s rationality-to-morality argument. He presents six objections to show that Sterba’s main argument grounded on the principle of non-question-beggingness fails to defeat amoralism. He also argues that another argument offered by Sterba to defeat amoralism fails
openaire +3 more sources
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1990
(1990). Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly: Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 451-454.
openaire +2 more sources
(1990). Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly: Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 451-454.
openaire +2 more sources
Sterba on Machan's “Concession”
Journal of Social Philosophy, 2001Reponse a J. Sterba concernant la position de l'A. sur la relation entre l'ideal de liberte, le bien-etre de la communaute et la conception libertaire des droits individuels.
openaire +1 more source
Sterba's Program of Philosophical Reconciliation
Journal of Social Philosophy, 1999Evaluation du programme de reconciliation philosophique entre la morale et la politique, en general, et entre le libertarisme et le liberalisme-providence, en particulier, developpe par J. Sterba, concernant les trois points suivants: 1) les doctrines abstraites; 2) leur comportement face aux fondements moraux; 3) leur application a la pratique ...
openaire +1 more source
On Sterba’s Argument from Rationality to Morality
The Journal of Ethics, 2014James Sterba argues for morality as a principled compromise between self-regarding and other-regarding reasons (Morality as Compromise) and that either egoists or altruists, who always give overriding weight to self-regarding and other-reasons, respectively, can be shown to beg the question against morality.
openaire +1 more source
Some remarks to the Sterba's Fluorescent method in application to the neurosecretory cells
Histochemie, 1968When staining the neurosecretory cells with N,N′-diethylpseudoisocyanine chloride according to Sterba fluorescence of nucleolus and structures in the peripheral zone of the cytoplasm was observed simultaneously with the fluorescence of the neurosecretory granules.
I V, Jakovleva +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
The Anthropomorphic God of James Sterba
Verba TheologicaIn this paper, the author tries to give his second and more precise response to the argument of James Sterba. According to Sterba’s words, if a good God existed, he would prevent all the horrendous evil occurrences. This is because a good God, if existed, would be a rational agent and subject to moral requirements.
openaire +1 more source
Sterba, Thomas, Herders neues Klösterlexikon
1970Theologie und Philosophie, Bd. 85 Nr.
openaire +1 more source

