Results 211 to 220 of about 15,692 (256)

Temporal stimulus-response compatibility.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001
The study of element-level stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) has predominantly focused on spatial and symbolic relationships and has involved measures of response time and (dichotomous) error rate. This article explores a new form of SRC that is observed when duration is the relevant feature of both the stimulus and the response, using a more ...
Grosjean, M., Mordkoff, J.
openaire   +4 more sources

Stimulus–response compatibility and affective computing: a review [PDF]

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2007
Affective computing, a human–factors effort to investigate the merits of emotions while people are working with human–computer interfaces, is gaining momentum. Measures to quantify affect (or its influences) range from EEG, to measurements of autonomic–nervous–system responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure), to less objective self–reports.
Ruud Meulenbroek
exaly   +3 more sources

Stimulus-Response Compatibility and the Motor System

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1982
Three experiments examined stimulus-response (S—R) compatibility relationships with the stimulus array perpendicular to the response array. In Experiments I and II, stimuli indicated right and left positions, while the responses were movements up and down. The mapping right/up and left/down was preferable for the right hand, but the reverse mapping was
D W, Bauer, J, Miller
openaire   +2 more sources

Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Videogame Performance

Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1995
We investigated the role of stimulus-response compatibility in influencing manual reactions to a moving visual target in a videogame (pong). 40 right-handed university men were assigned randomly to one of two experimental conditions, the normal game condition or a reverse control condition in which the response device on the right controls the left ...
R M, Brown, N L, Brown, D, DeLong, K, Reid   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Numerosity and Rhythmicity in Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Journal of Motor Behavior, 2006
When people must respond discriminatively to 1 or 2 stimuli by making 1 or 2 taps of a response key, they initiate the response more rapidly when the correct number of taps matches the number of stimuli (compatible condition) than when it mismatches (incompatible condition; J. O. Miller, S. G. Atkins, & F. Van Nes, 2005). Miller et al.
Stephen G, Atkins, Jeff O, Miller
openaire   +2 more sources

Mental imagery yields stimulus–response compatibility

Acta Psychologica, 1998
The present paper provides evidence for stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility effects in visual mental images. In two experiments subjects either studied a simple map (Experiment 1) or read a verbal description of the same map (Experiment 2), and then responded after generating a mental image of the presented information.
M, Tlauka, F P, McKenna
exaly   +3 more sources

Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space

Neuropsychologia, 1998
Spatial stimulus response (S-R) compatibility designates the observation that speeded reactions to unilateral stimuli are faster for the hand ipsilateral than for the hand contralateral to the sensory hemifield containing the stimulus. In two experiments involving presentation of the numbers 1 to 11 in the center of the visual field we show (1) a left ...
Bächtold D, Baumüller M, Brugger P
openaire   +3 more sources

Stimulus-Response Compatibility

1986
As was discussed in Chapter 1, the first step that must be taken in the creation of a general implementation of the chunking theory of learning, is the generalization of the model of task performance. In this chapter, we do exactly this, through the analysis and modeling of performance in a set of related stimulus-response compatibility tasks.
John Laird, Paul Rosenbloom, Allen Newell   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Naive Judgments of Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995
Subjects were asked to rate the usability of interface designs that varied in compatibility of stimulus-response mappings. In Study 1 subjects rated light-button layouts. In Study 2, the same subjects rated stove burner control designs. In Study 3, different subjects ranked fragments of computer command languages.
openaire   +1 more source

Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility

1990
Publisher Summary This chapter describes the different aspects of the spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. A stimulus dimension is relevant when the required response depends on the value of the stimulus in that dimension, whereas a stimulus dimension is irrelevant if values on it are uncorrelated with the required response.
Carlo Umiltá, Roberto Nicoletti
openaire   +1 more source