Results 261 to 270 of about 74,835 (307)

Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility

1990
Publisher Summary This chapter describes the different aspects of the spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. A stimulus dimension is relevant when the required response depends on the value of the stimulus in that dimension, whereas a stimulus dimension is irrelevant if values on it are uncorrelated with the required response.
Carlo Umiltá, Roberto Nicoletti
openaire   +1 more source

Hierarchical Knowledge Influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 2000
The influence of spatial stimulus grouping on stimulus-response compatibility effects was investigated in three experiments. Stimuli were grouped as part of a superordinate unit BY (1) perceptually organizing them (Experiment 1), (2) organizing them on the basis of semantic links (Experiment 2), or (3) arbitrary links (Experiment 3). In some instances
M, Tlauka, F P, McKenna
openaire   +2 more sources

Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2002
Romaiguère, Hasbroucq, Possamaï, and Seal (1993) reported a new compatibility effect from a task that required responses of two different target force levels to stimuli of two different intensities. Reaction times were shorter when high and low stimulus intensities were mapped to strong and weak force presses respectively than when this mapping was ...
Stefan, Mattes, Hartmut, Leuthold, Rolf, Ulrich   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Naïve judgements of stimulus–response compatibility

Ergonomics, 2010
An experiment is reported that is an extension of Payne (1995) and of Vu and Proctor (2003). These authors used various light/key arrangements to determine the ability of naive subjects to rate the usability of interface designs and found that naive judgements were not accurate, apart from selecting a best design.
openaire   +2 more sources

Numerosity and Rhythmicity in Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Journal of Motor Behavior, 2006
When people must respond discriminatively to 1 or 2 stimuli by making 1 or 2 taps of a response key, they initiate the response more rapidly when the correct number of taps matches the number of stimuli (compatible condition) than when it mismatches (incompatible condition; J. O. Miller, S. G. Atkins, & F. Van Nes, 2005). Miller et al.
Stephen G, Atkins, Jeff O, Miller
openaire   +2 more sources

Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Psychophysiology

1991
Psychophysiological measures can be used to illuminate the role of motor system activity in chronometric paradigms and, in particular, in studies of stimulus-response compatibility. These measures provide more or less direct access to those covert response processes that are proposed in various theories of stimulus-response compatibility (e.g ...
Michael G. H. Coles, William J. Gehring, Gabriele Gratton, Emanuel Donchin   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility

Psychological Research, 1991
The relative functional significance of attention shifts and attentional zooming for the coding of stimulus position in spatial compatibility tasks is demonstrated by proposing and testing experimentally a tentative explanation of the absence of a Simon effect in Experiment 3 of Umiltà and Liotti (1987).
openaire   +3 more sources

Stimulus-response compatibilities during top-bottom discriminations.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2008
Participants indicated whether a small dot was located near the top or bottom pole of a rotated object. Response times increased as a function of object orientation more for top trials than for bottom trials. The interaction between orientation and response was shown to be due to a relationship between response times and the dot's height on the screen.
Phil, Light, Jeff P, Hamm
openaire   +2 more sources

Naive Judgments of Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995
Subjects were asked to rate the usability of interface designs that varied in compatibility of stimulus-response mappings. In Study 1 subjects rated light-button layouts. In Study 2, the same subjects rated stove burner control designs. In Study 3, different subjects ranked fragments of computer command languages. In all three judgment tasks, subjects
openaire   +1 more source

Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1997
Neuronal mechanisms underlying stimulus-response (S-R) associations in S-R compatibility tasks were identified in 2 experiments with monkeys. Visual stimuli were presented on the left and right calling for left-right movements under congruent and incongruent S-R mapping instructions.
A, Riehle, S, Kornblum, J, Requin
openaire   +2 more sources