Results 211 to 220 of about 48,940 (255)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Stopping Sets of Hermitian Codes

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2016
Combinatorial structures called stopping sets are useful in analyzing the performance of a linear code when coupled with an iterative decoding algorithm over an erasure channel. In this paper, we consider stopping sets of Hermitian codes.
Gretchen Matthews
exaly   +3 more sources

Generalized Stopping Sets and Stopping Redundancy

2007 Information Theory and Applications Workshop, 2007
Iterative decoding for linear block codes over erasure channels may be much simpler than optimal decoding but its performance is usually not as good. Here, we present a general iterative decoding technique that gives a more refined trade-off between complexity and performance. In each iteration, a system of equations is solved.
Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Jos Weber
exaly   +2 more sources

Small stopping sets in Steiner triple systems

Cryptography and Communications, 2008
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Charles Colbourn, , Colbourn Charles J
exaly   +2 more sources

Pseudocodeword weights and stopping sets

International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings., 2004
We examine the structure of pseudocodewords in Tanner graphs and derive lower bounds of pseudocodeword weights. The weight of a pseudocodeword is related to the size of its support set, which forms a stopping set in the Tanner graph.
Kelley, C   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Stopping set elimination for LDPC codes

2017 55th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2017
This work studies the Stopping-Set Elimination Problem, namely, given a stopping set, how to remove the fewest erasures so that the remaining erasures can be decoded by belief propagation in k iterations (including k =∞). The NP-hardness of the problem is proven. An approximation algorithm is presented for k = 1.
Anxiao Andrew Jiang   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Stopping set analysis for Hamming codes

IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 2005., 2005
In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three in a Hamming code. In this paper, we investigate how this number depends on the parity-check matrix used in the decoding process. First, we present basic results on stopping set enumerators for block codes in general.
Jos H. Weber, Khaled A. S. Abdel-Ghaffar
openaire   +2 more sources

Stopping sets for physical-layer security

2010 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 2010
Physical-layer security based on wiretap codes can be used to complement cryptographic applications at higher layers of the protocol stack. We assume a passive eavesdropper that has access to noise-corrupted codewords with erasures that are statistically independent to those of the legitimate communication partners.
Willie K. Harrison   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Stopping Set Distribution of LDPC Code Ensembles

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2003
Stopping sets determine the performance of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes under iterative decoding over erasure channels. We derive several results on the asymptotic behavior of stopping sets in Tanner-graph ensembles, including the following. An expression for the normalized average stopping set distribution, yielding, in particular, a critical
Alon Orlitsky   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Predictability and stopping on lattices of sets

Probability Theory and Related Fields, 1993
As a first step in the development of a general theory of set-indexed martingales, we define predictability on a general space with respect to a filtration indexed by a lattice of sets. We prove a characterization of the predictable \(\sigma\)-algebra in terms of adapted and ``left- continuous'' processes without any form of topology for the index set.
Ivanoff, B. Gail   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Stopping Rules in Political Settings

2021
This chapter compares three rules of voice integration or ‘stopping rules’ (majority voting, unanimity, consensus) in terms of their democratic, epistemic and pragmatic value. It shows, first, how the consensus rule, whereby decisions are made without voting when nobody opposes openly, fares best at reconciling all three normative demands and, second ...
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy