Results 251 to 260 of about 20,193 (288)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Strict Liability versus Negligence
The Journal of Legal Studies, 1980This chapter compares strict liability and negligence rules on the basis of the incentives they provide to "appropriately" reduce accident losses. Under strict liability, the outcome is efficient, and again the reasoning is a little different from that in the last subcase.
openaire +1 more source
2002
Abstract We have seen that there is a general principle, of a sort, to the effect that one is liable for the foreseeable harm due to one’s unreasonable conduct unless it would be unfair, unjust, or unreasonable to impose such liability.
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract We have seen that there is a general principle, of a sort, to the effect that one is liable for the foreseeable harm due to one’s unreasonable conduct unless it would be unfair, unjust, or unreasonable to impose such liability.
openaire +2 more sources
Vicarious Liability Under a Strict Liability Rule
Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 2021Se-Hak Chun, Jeong-Yoo Kim
exaly
Strict and Vicarious Liability
1989Strict liability is the phrase used to refer to criminal offences which do not require mens rea in respect of one or more elements of the actus reus. The phrase ‘absolute liability’ is sometimes used, but this is misleading because it wrongly implies both that an offence possesses no fault element at all, and that it is not possible to plead a defence ...
openaire +1 more source