Results 241 to 250 of about 204,745 (352)

Correction: Evidence of Cosmic Impact at Abu Hureyra, Syria at the Younger Dryas Onset (~ 12.8 ka): High-temperature melting at > 2200 °C. [PDF]

open access: yesSci Rep
Moore AMT   +13 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Efficacy and safety of biologics for hidradenitis suppurativa: A network meta‐analysis of phase III trials

open access: yesJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, EarlyView.
Data from 2731 patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treated with biologics for 12–16 weeks in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included in a network meta‐analysis (NMA). Adalimumab showed the highest efficacy in achieving a clinical HS response 50 (HiSCR50) and the lowest incidence of adverse events (AE).
Laura Calabrese   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Short‐term efficacy of biologics in moderate‐to‐severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and NMA

open access: yesJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, EarlyView.
A meta‐analysis was conducted comparing the efficacy of biologics for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) for 12–16 weeks. Based on the SUCRA, bimekizumab was ranked the most efficacious treatment compared with secukinumab and adalimumab for all assessed efficacy outcomes, positioning it as the best treatment across biologic‐naïve and ...
Haley B. Naik   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

Long‐term efficacy of biologics in moderate‐to‐severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and MAIC

open access: yesJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, EarlyView.
A matching‐adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) was conducted, comparing approved biologics for long‐term (48–52 weeks) treatment of moderate‐to‐severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Using weighted patient‐level trial data allowed re‐estimation of relative bimekizumab efficacy compared with aggregate secukinumab and adalimumab trial data ...
Thrasyvoulos Tzellos   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

Knock knock, who's there? Identifying wild species‐specific fish sounds with passive acoustic localization and random forest models

open access: yesJournal of Fish Biology, EarlyView.
Abstract Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a useful non‐destructive tool for evaluating species presence, diversity and abundance. However, in marine environments, a dearth of tools and methods for identifying wild, species‐specific fish calls makes quantitative PAM assessments for specific fish species challenging.
Darienne Lancaster   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy