Results 101 to 110 of about 707 (146)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Supererogation and Forgiveness

2023
Christopher Cowley, Cowley Christopher
exaly   +2 more sources

Supererogation

2017
This chapter concerns whether the best account of virtue will involve the idea that an agent can ‘go beyond’ duty in a morally praiseworthy way. The chapter begins by outlining Henry Sidgwick’s view that supererogation involves an immoral paradox, since it seems to allow a morally blameless agent to do less morally than she might.
openaire   +3 more sources

Supererogation.

The Philosophical Quarterly, 1983
Jonathan Dancy, D. Heyd
openaire   +2 more sources

The nature of supererogation

The Journal of Value Inquiry, 1986
The concept of supererogation is an act that it is right to do but not wrong not to do. The moral trinity of the deontic logic excludes such acts from moral theory. A moral theory that is based on duty or obligation unqualified seems inevitably to make all good acts obligations, whether construed from a teleological or deontological point of view.
openaire   +1 more source

Three paradoxes of supererogation

Nous, 2021
Daniel Munoz
exaly  

Supererogation.

Noûs, 1985
Douglas N. Walton, David Heyd
openaire   +1 more source

A critical note on sporting supererogation

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 2021
Steffen Börge
exaly  

Representing supererogation

Journal of Logic and Computation, 2013
openaire   +1 more source

Beneficence and Supererogation

1992
According to standard definitions of supererogation, acts are supererogatory if and only if they are neither morally obligatory nor morally prohibited, but nevertheless have moral value (are morally good, etc.).’ While philosophers generally agree about what “supererogatory” means, however, they differ widely in their views regarding both the existence
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy