Results 191 to 200 of about 1,092,246 (292)

Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.

JAMA Netw Open, 2023
Gaffney A, Himmelstein DU, Dickman S, Myers C, Hemenway D, McCormick D, Woolhandler S.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

A Post‐Neoliberal European Order? Public Purpose and Private Accumulation in Green Industrial Policy

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
This article examines the emerging legal rationalities of EU's green industrial policy, questioning if they represent a departure from the neoliberal paradigm that prioritised safeguarding the competitive order. I argue that the European Green Industrial Plan signals a new role for law in the orchestration and balancing of public purpose and private ...
Ioannis Kampourakis
wiley   +1 more source

A Selection of Cases Illustrating Equity Pleading and Practice with Definitions and Rules of the United States Supreme Court Relating Thereto

, 1902
W. D. L., E. Richard Shipp, John B. Daish   +2 more
openalex   +2 more sources

Access to Family Building Act: an antidote to Alabama's Supreme Court Holding on in vitro fertilization. [PDF]

F S Rep
Adashi EY, O'Mahony DP.
europepmc   +1 more source

The Conflict of Public Health Law and Civil Liberties Part II: The Vaccine Mandates and What the Supreme Court Decided. [PDF]

Am J Med, 2022
Harris CE.
europepmc   +1 more source

William A. Robson and the Making of English Administrative Law

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
This article examines the role of William A. Robson (1895‐1980) in the making of English administrative law. Criticising English common lawyers who believed that the growing responsibility of officials in law‐making and dispute resolution was a symptom of ‘administrative lawlessness’ that was sapping the foundations of English liberties, Robson argued ...
Martin Loughlin
wiley   +1 more source

Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling.

JAMA Intern Med, 2022
Poliak A, Satybaldiyeva N, Strathdee SA, Leas EC, Rao R, Smith D, Ayers JW.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Climate Change, Environmental Impact Assessment and the Supreme Court: Why the Legal Detail Matters in R (Finch) v Surrey County Council

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
In R (Finch) v Surrey County Council, the Supreme Court held by a 3:2 majority that Surrey County Council's decision to grant planning permission for an onshore crude oil extraction project was unlawful. The environmental assessment accompanying the application for planning permission – a legally required assessment of the ‘direct and indirect effects’
Sonam Gordhan
wiley   +1 more source

The Effect of Rules Shifting Supreme Court Jurisdiction from Mandatory to Discretionary - An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan [PDF]

Theoretical works suggest that granting a supreme court discretion in choosing the cases to be decided on the merits could shift dockets away from traditional case-based adjudication and towards issue-based adjudication.
Eisenberg, Theodore, Huang, Kuo-Chang
core  

The overturn of Roe v Wade: Google searches for teratogenic medications following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. [PDF]

Int J Womens Dermatol
Nohria A, Desai D, Klein EJ, Senna MM, Aguh C, Farah RS, Bordone L, Krueger LD, Mesinkovska N, Cummins D, Lo Sicco KI.   +10 more
europepmc   +1 more source