Results 301 to 310 of about 14,049,576 (343)
ERRATUM: Current evidence on drug therapy for dementia in people with Down syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews. [PDF]
Dement Neuropsycholeuropepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2021
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to poor review currency and accuracy. "Living systematic review" (LSR) is an approach that aims to continually update a review, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available.
Mark, Simmonds +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to poor review currency and accuracy. "Living systematic review" (LSR) is an approach that aims to continually update a review, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available.
Mark, Simmonds +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2023Systematic reviews (SRs) have become a central tool for evidence-based health care over the last 30 years. The number of SRs being published has increased steadily. However, concerns have been raised regarding the duplication of work, methodological flaws and the currency of many systematic reviews, also in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Breuer, Claudia +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Oncology Nursing Forum, 2014
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence from several studies on the same topic (Grant & Booth, 2009). The precise and systematic method differentiates systematic reviews from traditional reviews (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, & Antes, 2003).
openaire +2 more sources
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence from several studies on the same topic (Grant & Booth, 2009). The precise and systematic method differentiates systematic reviews from traditional reviews (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, & Antes, 2003).
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2022
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a practice model to promote healthcare quality. Since the World Health Organization highlighted the importance of IPC in 2010, a large volume of IPC-related research has been published. Multiple systematic reviews
Holly Wei +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a practice model to promote healthcare quality. Since the World Health Organization highlighted the importance of IPC in 2010, a large volume of IPC-related research has been published. Multiple systematic reviews
Holly Wei +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2008Systematic reviewers increasingly must decide whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into complex systematic reviews that are commissioned to support clinical guideline development or for other health policy uses. To date, however, this issue has been largely unexamined.
Evelyn P, Whitlock +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicina Intensiva, 2017In this review the usual methods applied in systematic reviews and meta-analyses are outlined. The ideal hypothesis for a systematic review should be generated by information not used later in meta-analyses. The selection of studies involves searching in
M. Delgado-Rodríguez, M. Sillero-arenas
semanticscholar +1 more source