Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”). Part 1 [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2022 The Chronicle “Tarikh-I Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarak Geray Ginghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Ottoman state in 1682–1703.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +4 more sources
Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”) (part 4)* [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2023 The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by the Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman state in 1682–1703.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +3 more sources
Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”). Part 2 [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2022 The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by the Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman state in 1682–1703.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +3 more sources
Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”). Part 3 [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2023 The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by the Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman state in 1682–1703.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +3 more sources
Remmal Khoja. Chronicle «Tarikh-i Sahib Geray Khan» («History about Sahib Geray Khan»). Part 5. The end [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2020 To the attention of the readers is offered the translation into Russian of the final fragments from the chronicle «Tarikh-i Sahib Geray Khan» (XVI c.).
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +4 more sources
Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”) (part 5) [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрениеThe Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by the Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Crimean Khanate and the Ottoman state in 1682–1703.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +3 more sources
Remmal Khoja. Chronicle «Tarikh-i Sahib Geray Khan» («History about Sahib Geray Khan»). Part 4. [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2019 To the attention of the readers is offered the translation into Russian of the fragments from the chronicle «Tarikh-i Sahib Geray Khan» (XVI c.). The beginning and continuation of the work were published in the previous issues [№ 1(10) and № 2(11) for ...
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +3 more sources
The national symbols in the publications of O. Akchokrakly (comments on the article “The matter of the Flag”) [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2019 The article offers the Russian translation of the publication by the Crimean Tatar scientist and writer O. Akchokrakly (1878–1938) entitled “Bayrak Meselesi” (“The matter of the Flag”) from No. 108 of the “Millet” newspaper in 1917.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +2 more sources
Remmal Khoja. Chronicle “Tarih-i Sahib Giray Khan” (“History of Khan Sahib Giray”). Part 3. [PDF]
Крымское историческое обозрение, 2019 To the attention of the readers is offered the Russian translation of the fragments from the chronicle «Tarikh-i Sahib Geray Khan» (XVI c.) The beginning of the work was published in the previous issue of the journal.
Refat Abduzhemilev
doaj +1 more source
Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Historical science, 2020 In the article the fragments of the chronicle «Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray» of the Crimean historian Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Chingizi, the content of which covers the description of the foreign policy of Peter the Great in the south at the end of the XVII century, are examined. The copy of the work has been preserved in the Austrian National Library.
R. Abduzhemilev
semanticscholar +3 more sources