Results 1 to 10 of about 139,909 (137)
Lost in transmission: Testimonial justification and practical reason [PDF]
Transmission views of testimony hold that a speaker's knowledge or justification can become the audience's knowledge or justification. We argue that transmission views are incompatible with the hypothesis that one's epistemic state, together with one's ...
Peet, Andrew, Pitcovski, Eli
core +3 more sources
Eyewitnesses play a significant role in criminal investigations and legal processes worldwide. Just like any other type of forensic evidence, eyewitness evidence has a margin of error. These errors, caused by numerous factors, affect the validity of eyewitness testimony.
Odinot, G. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Conditionals and testimony [PDF]
Conditionals and conditional reasoning have been a long-standing focus of research across a number of disciplines, ranging from psychology through linguistics to philosophy. But almost no work has concerned itself with the question of how hearing or reading a conditional changes our beliefs.
Collins, Peter J. +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
Epistemic internalism and testimonial justification [PDF]
According to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons for believing certain propositions. Epistemic externalists, on the other hand, deny this.
Egeland, Jonathan
core +1 more source
David Hume's Reductionist Epistemology of Testimony [PDF]
David Hume advances a reductionist epistemology of testimony: testimonial beliefs are justified on the basis of beliefs formed from other sources. This reduction, however, has been misunderstood.
Faulkner, P.
core +1 more source
On the Rationality of our Response to Testimony [PDF]
The assumption that we largely lack reasons for accepting testimony has dominated its epistemology. Given the further assumption that whatever reasons we do have are insufficient to justify our testimonial beliefs, many conclude that any account of ...
Faulkner, P.
core +1 more source
Sex, Threats, and Absent Victims: The Lessons of Regina v. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases [PDF]
In 2004, Crawford v. Washington, authored by Justice Scalia, revolutionized the law of confrontation by requiring that, aside from two discrete exceptions, all testimonial statements (those made with the expectation that they will serve to prosecute the ...
Orenstein, Aviva
core +4 more sources
ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan [PDF]
DeLancey (1992) and Hongladarom (1994) suppose that ḥdug means 'sit' in Old and Classical Tibetan, and that these languages entirely lack the evidential use of this morpheme well known in 'Lhasa' Tibetan.
Hill, Nathan W.
core +1 more source
This paper introduces and argues for the hypothesis that judgments of testimonial worth are central to our practice of normatively appraising speech. It is argued that judgments of testimonial worth are central both to the judgement that an agent has ...
Peet, Andrew
core
Ohio v. Clark: Testimonial Statements Under the Confrontation Clause [PDF]
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court declared that an accused right under the Constitution to confront the witnesses against him applied only to “testimonial statements.” That decision, however, did not attempt to fully define the scope of ...
Sloss, Mesha
core +1 more source

