Results 1 to 10 of about 137,917,652 (257)
The Romanic Review: Tomo 41 (1950), Tomo 42 (1951).
Se reseñó: The Romanic Review: tomo 41 (1950), tomo 42 (1951).
M A Vergara
exaly +4 more sources
The Romanic Review: Tomo 43 (1952), Tomo 44 (1953), Tomo 45 (1954).
Se reseñó: The Romanic Review: tomo 43 (1952), tomo 44 (1953), tomo 45 (1954).
M A Vergara
exaly +4 more sources
Se reseñó: The romanic review: tomo 46 (1955), tomo 47 (1956), tomo 48 (1957), tomo 49 (1958), tomo 50 (1959), tomo 51 (1960), tomo 52 (1961).
Antonio Alatorre
exaly +4 more sources
This article is a kind of deferred review of a comment made in the debates on the “reform” of the field of literary historiography, published in the Romanic Review from 1926 to 1929.
Enza Biagini
doaj +1 more source
Carta Magna: A Provocation to consider the Relatinship between Constitution and Constitutionalism
This work is based on the critical analysis of the impact the Magna Carta had as a historical precedent for constitutionalism, and the structure and redaction of constitutions worldwide.
Agustín Grijalva Jiménez
doaj +1 more source
Del caballero épico al caballero novelesco: acercamiento a la evolución del personaje [PDF]
The goal of this paper is to review the medieval literary knight's transformations upon its rising in the chansons de geste through its entrenchment as the protagonist character into the most representatives medieval romances of chivalry.
Lucila Lobato Osorio
doaj
Dr. Romanes's Article in the “Contemporary Review.” [PDF]
ABSENCE from England has hitherto prevented me from seeing Mr. Poulton's letter in your issue of July 26 (p. 295). Having just read it, I am not a little surprised that he should have deemed it necessary to refer me to the titles of two of the most notorious essays in the recent literature of Darwinism. Nor can I fail to wonder that, without a particle
openaire +1 more source
The Monuments of Roman Ancyra reviewed
Cataloged from PDF version of article.
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Antiquity, 1931
About one-third of this book consists of a general introduction to the study of Roman Gaul; the rest is concerned with the Roman fortifications of the province; and all was to have been produced by Déchelette himself, but, after his untimely death in battle, it passed to Albert Grenier, Professeur d’Antiquités nationales et rhenanes à la Faculté des ...
openaire +1 more source
About one-third of this book consists of a general introduction to the study of Roman Gaul; the rest is concerned with the Roman fortifications of the province; and all was to have been produced by Déchelette himself, but, after his untimely death in battle, it passed to Albert Grenier, Professeur d’Antiquités nationales et rhenanes à la Faculté des ...
openaire +1 more source

