Results 271 to 280 of about 166,198,655 (304)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Is the Special Theory of Relativity Wrong ?: The Special Theory of Relativity
Nature, 1968Since the publication of Professor Dingle's article (Nature, 216, 119; 1967), arguing that the special theory of relativity is incorrect, several comments on this issue have been received, and we propose in the next few months to publish a selection of these.
openaire +1 more source
RELATIVE-SAMENESS COUNTERPART THEORY
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2008Just as set theory can be divorced from Ernst Zermelo's original axiomatization of it, counterpart theory can be divorced from the eight postulates that were originally stipulated by David Lewis (1968, p. 114) to constitute it. These were postulates governing some of the properties and relations holding among possible worlds and their inhabitants.
openaire +2 more sources
K-Theory, 1992
When \(F\) is a field the Milnor \(K\)-groups, \(K^ M_ n(F)\), are defined as the graded algebra on \(F^*\) divided by the two-sided ideal generated by elements \(a\otimes (1-a)\). There is a natural map between Milnor and Quillen \(K\)-theory, \(s_ p: K^ M_ p(F)\to K_ p(F)\). It is shown by \textit{A. A. Suslin} [Lect. Notes Math. 1046, 357-375 (1984;
openaire +2 more sources
When \(F\) is a field the Milnor \(K\)-groups, \(K^ M_ n(F)\), are defined as the graded algebra on \(F^*\) divided by the two-sided ideal generated by elements \(a\otimes (1-a)\). There is a natural map between Milnor and Quillen \(K\)-theory, \(s_ p: K^ M_ p(F)\to K_ p(F)\). It is shown by \textit{A. A. Suslin} [Lect. Notes Math. 1046, 357-375 (1984;
openaire +2 more sources
Why Special Relativity is a Problem for the A-Theory
Philosophical Quarterly, 2020Jason Turner
exaly
A test theory of special relativity: III. Second-order tests
General Relativity and Gravitation, 1977Roman U Sexl
exaly