Results 161 to 170 of about 15,642 (212)
The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman [PDF]
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 1981 Recent descriptive and historical work on Tibeto-Burman has shown that personal indices on the verb in the "pron- ominalized" languages generally reflect not semantic roles or grammatical relations, as in more familiar languages, but a hierarchy of ...
DeLancey, Scott
openaire +2 more sources
“Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages [PDF]
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2011 The case-marking systems of Tibeto-Burman languages are a long standing problem in both synchronic description and analysis and historical reconstruction.
DeLancey, Scott
openaire +2 more sources
, 2015 The Tibeto-Burman linguistic phylum was identified in 1823. However, the term Tibeto-Burman was subsequently used in two different meanings, one by scholars following Julius von Klaproth's polyphyletic framework and another by scholars operating within ...
van Driem, George +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Tangut and Tibeto-Burman morphology [PDF]
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 1983 Since the earliest serious Tangut studies (Laufer 1916) it has been generally accepted that Tangut is a Tibeto-Burman lan¬guage, with particular links to the Lolo-Burmese branch of the family.
DeLancey, Scott
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Evidentiality in Darma (Tibeto-Burman) [PDF]
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2007 This paper outlines the evidentiality system found in Darma, a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in Uttarakhand, India. The source of information is indicated for four levels: direct evidence, general knowledge, inferential and reported.
Willis, Christina M.
openaire +2 more sources
2017
AbstractA number of Tibeto-Burman languages exhibit morphological ergative alignment, while others clearly do not. In these languages, matters of information structure determine core argument marking. Specifically, both A and S marking may be used to indicate topic, contrastive topic, broad focus, and/or contrastive focus.
openaire +1 more source
AbstractA number of Tibeto-Burman languages exhibit morphological ergative alignment, while others clearly do not. In these languages, matters of information structure determine core argument marking. Specifically, both A and S marking may be used to indicate topic, contrastive topic, broad focus, and/or contrastive focus.
openaire +1 more source
1987
This monograph lays the foundation for a prosodological theory of Tibeto-Burman languages within a comparative and reconstructional framework. It is primarily based on data collections of mostly unknown languages on which the author worked for more than 10 years on several projects.
openaire +1 more source
This monograph lays the foundation for a prosodological theory of Tibeto-Burman languages within a comparative and reconstructional framework. It is primarily based on data collections of mostly unknown languages on which the author worked for more than 10 years on several projects.
openaire +1 more source
A candidate for a Tibeto-Burman innovation
Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 2017Based on a survey of 21 languages chosen to represent the diversity of Sino-Tibetan, this paper proposes that all Sino-Tibetan languages except Chinese have lost a phonological distinction between two Proto-Sino-Tibetan codas, *-q (Old Chinese *-ʔ, dialectally *-k) and *-k (Old Chinese *-k): the two codas merged as *-k in Proto-Tibeto-Burman.
openaire +2 more sources
Etymological notes on Tibeto-Burman
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 1985Benedict, in the Conspectus, notes the existence of comparative evidence for only one case-like particle of clearly PRB provenience, the well-known subordinating (i.e. genitive and relativizing) *-ki or *-gi. He briefly suggests that the lack of other such particles reconstructible for PTB can be taken as an indication that the general category cannot ...
openaire +2 more sources