Results 41 to 50 of about 1,472 (161)

Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high‐frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration

Physiological Reports, 2020
Background In this study, we investigate the capacity of two different non‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques (anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal tDCS) and high‐frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf‐tRNS ...
Jan Haeckert, Christoph Lasser, Benjamin Pross, Alkomiet Hasan, Wolfgang Strube   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Evaluating Aftereffects of Short-Duration Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cortical Excitability

Neural Plasticity, 2011
A 10-minute application of highfrequency (100–640 Hz) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) increases baseline levels of cortical excitability, lasting around 1 hr poststimulation Terney et al. (2008).
Leila Chaieb, Walter Paulus, Andrea Antal   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus

Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2013
Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external sound stimulus. This phantom sound has been related to plastic changes and hyperactivity in the auditory cortex.
Sven eVanneste, Felipe eFregni, Dirk eDe Ridder   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks

Scientific Reports, 2021
Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive.
Alberto Lema, Sandra Carvalho, Felipe Fregni, Óscar F. Gonçalves, Jorge Leite   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Low to No Effect: Application of tRNS During Two-Digit Addition

Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2018
Transcranial electric stimulation such as transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been used to investigate structure-function relationships in numerical cognition.
Silke M. Bieck, Silke M. Bieck, Christina Artemenko, Christina Artemenko, Korbinian Moeller, Korbinian Moeller, Korbinian Moeller, Elise Klein   +7 more
doaj   +1 more source

Transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation does not modulate Nogo N2 and Go/Nogo reaction times in somatosensory and auditory modalities

Scientific Reports, 2023
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) of the primary sensory or motor cortex can improve sensorimotor functions by enhancing circuit excitability and processing fidelity.
Koya Yamashiro, Koyuki Ikarashi, Taiki Makibuchi, Sayaka Anazawa, Yasuhiro Baba, Tomomi Fujimoto, Genta Ochi, Daisuke Sato   +7 more
doaj   +1 more source

Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation – An intraindividual comparison of different techniques

Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2022
Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) techniques have been shown to induce cortical plasticity. As an important relay in the motor system, the cerebellum is an interesting target for plasticity induction using tCS, aiming to modulate its excitability ...
Rebecca Herzog, Rebecca Herzog, Till M. Berger, Martje G. Pauly, Martje G. Pauly, Martje G. Pauly, Honghu Xue, Elmar Rueckert, Alexander Münchau, Tobias Bäumer, Anne Weissbach, Anne Weissbach   +11 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post stroke visual impairment - a pilot study proposal

Brain Stimulation
Yiding Li
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence

Brain Stimulation, 2020
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance in healthy individuals, however effects tend to be modest and variable.
O.W. Murphy, K.E. Hoy, D. Wong, N.W. Bailey, P.B. Fitzgerald, R.A. Segrave   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Cerebellar Contribution to Rapid Cross‐Modal Attentional Shift in Visual‐Tactile Processing

Psychophysiology, Volume 63, Issue 4, April 2026.
ABSTRACT Clinical and behavioral studies suggest the right lateral cerebellar hemisphere plays a critical role in cognition, particularly attention. Contralateral connections between the cerebellum and cerebrum via the thalamus support this involvement.
Simran Mughal, Kayla E. Dolman, Tiffany Y. Stupka, Kylee R. Graham, Danielle Saney, Sean K. Meehan, W. Richard Staines   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source