Results 101 to 110 of about 1,002,132 (208)

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Revision of Non‐union Following Prior Posterior Surgery: A Case Report

Orthopaedic Surgery, 2015
We report the case of a 75‐year‐old lady who presented with a L2‐3 non‐union 18 months following a L2‐3 and L3‐4 posterior decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kevin Phan, Ralph J Mobbs
doaj   +1 more source

Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

, 2015
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Schairer, WW, Qamirani, E, Hu, SS, Berven, Sigurd, Le, H, Berven, SH, Fujimori, T   +6 more
core  

unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF)

, 2015
: Results and clinical outcome of a prospective multicenter clinical study involving 100 patients undergoing a lumbar interbody fusion procedure using an unilateral approach to the spine to introduce a new surgical technique as a viable and less invasive
zachee, benoit robert; Orthopaedic Department Az Nikolaas
core  

Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Posterolateral Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Orthopaedic Surgery
Objective Although endoscopic technologies have been increasingly applied in lumbar fusion surgery in recent years, the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic posterolateral fusion compared with lateral fusion remain unclear.
Xijian Hu, Lei Yan, Jing Chai, Xiaofeng Zhao, Haifeng Liu, Jinhuai Zhu, Huo Chai, Yibo Zhao, Bin Zhao   +8 more
doaj   +1 more source

Transdural retrieval of retropulsed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) are performed for various lumbar spine pathologies. Posterior migration of an interbody cage is a complication that may result in neurologic injury and require reoperation.
Nicholas C. Eley, Jean-Christophe Leveque, Rajiv K. Sethi, Devon Lefever, Thomas Allen Hanks   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

BackgroundMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) is one of the most commonly used methods for lumbar fusion. However, in recent years, the unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) has also gradually ...
Lang Hu, Xiang Chen, Liang Shi, Zhihui Zhang, Yi Liu, Jingbo Xie   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Comparison of Superior Facet Joint Violation, Pedicle Breach, and Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Versus Robotic Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Observational Study

Indian Spine Journal
Background: Accurate placement of the pedicle screw is vital to avoid neurovascular injury. In transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a known risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is superior facet joint (SFJ) infringement during ...
Gnana Shankar Kanamarlapudi, Manoj Kumar, Puneet Girdhar, Tungish Bansal, Samarth Mittal, Manish Garg   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Concept of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Insertion Device

, 2017
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgeries have nowadays became popular for treatment of degenerated spinal disorders. The interbody fusion technique like TLIF maintains load bearing capacity of the spine and a suitable disc height ...
Shruti S. Raut, Neha A. Madgulkar, S. P. Wadkar, Sangram A. Sathe   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

, 2009
The aim of this study was to compare our experience with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) and open midline transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A total of 36 patients suffering from isthmic spondylolisthesis or
Kosmopoulos, V., Tsiridis, E., Schizas, C., Tzinieris, N.   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience [PDF]

, 2018
The aim of this study was to compare our experience with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) and open midline transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A total of 36 patients suffering from isthmic spondylolisthesis or
Kosmopoulos, Victor, Schizas, Constantin, Tsiridis, Elefterios, Tzinieris, Nicolas   +3 more
core