A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [PDF]
Background and Objective: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed ...
Gotam Das +2 more
exaly +6 more sources
Clinical efficacy of intraoral ultrasonography versus transgingival probing for measurement of gingival thickness in different gingival biotypes: a clinical trial [PDF]
Background Transgingival probing is conventionally used for gingival thickness (GT) measurement. However, invasiveness is a major drawback of transgingival probing. Thus, researchers have been in search of alternative methods for measurement of GT.
Yaser Safi
exaly +5 more sources
Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method [PDF]
Background: Gingival biotype is the thickness of the gingiva in the faciopalatal dimension. It has a significant impact on the outcome of the restorative, regenerative and implant therapy.
R. G. Shiva Manjunath +2 more
doaj +4 more sources
Background: The objectives of the present study were to establish transgingival probing as an evaluating method in the clinical studies of periodontal regenerative techniques and to compare the effectiveness of transgingival probing to the surgical entry.
Monika Bansal, Tej Bali Singh
doaj +4 more sources
Background: Tobacco smoking is an independent risk factor for periodontal disease which increases periodontal pocketing, attachment loss, as well as bone loss leading to varied severity and bone destruction in the form of horizontal and vertical patterns.
B J Janardhana Amaranath +5 more
doaj +4 more sources
Comparison of Ultrasonography, CBCT , Transgingival Probing, Colour‐Coded and Periodontal Probe Transparency With Histological Gingival Thickness: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study Revisiting Thick Versus Thin Gingiva [PDF]
ABSTRACT Aim To assess the reliability of ultrasonographic, cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT), probe transparency and transgingival probing (TGP) methods in evaluating gingival thickness (GT), compared with the gold standard histological assessment.
Hamoun Sabri +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method
A decided attitude of expectation among many patients has given a new perspective to regenerative and plastic periodonta surgery. With authors emphasizing on the importance of gingival thickness, attempts are being made to obtain necessary information ...
Savitha B, Vandana K
doaj +3 more sources
Background: Given these limitations, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of machine learning (ML) software as a noninvasive technique for assessing gingival phenotype, compared to conventional methods like probe transparency and ...
Supriya S. Kaule +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
Comparison of gingival and periodontal phenotype classification methods and phenotype-related clinical parameters: cross-sectional observational study [PDF]
Background The aim of this study was to assess gingival and periodontal-phenotype by using Standard-Periodontal-Probing (SPP), Colored-Periodontal-Probing (CPP), and Cone-Beam-Computed-Tomography (CBCT) in comparison to gold standard transgingival ...
Dila İrem Aşkın +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
Introduction: Measuring gingival thickness (GT) is crucial in periodontal and implant dentistry as it impacts clinical decisions and outcomes. Materials and methods: Several methods are employed to assess GT, including conebeam computed tomography (CBCT),
Ankita Pati +5 more
doaj +2 more sources

