Results 71 to 80 of about 780 (93)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Trauma rehabilitation outcome scoring
Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2008Appropriate measurements of success in trauma systems are evolving. We review the rationale behind prior trauma and rehabilitation outcomes measures, and how they have led to the current rehabilitation tools in use today. In addition, we review the difficulties with current methods and future improvements that need to occur.As medicine marches toward ...
David A, Horwitz, Douglas J E, Schuerer
openaire +2 more sources
Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, 2002
Only based on a standardized terminology of ocular trauma terms, and using a very large number of injuries treated by a wide variety of ophthalmologists, could a reliable method be developed so that the functional outcome of a serious eye injury can be predicted with reasonable certainty.
Ferenc, Kuhn +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Only based on a standardized terminology of ocular trauma terms, and using a very large number of injuries treated by a wide variety of ophthalmologists, could a reliable method be developed so that the functional outcome of a serious eye injury can be predicted with reasonable certainty.
Ferenc, Kuhn +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Introduction of a novel trauma score
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2012Early diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and reliable prediction of outcome are essential for determining treatment strategies and allocating resources. This study introduces the Eppendorf-Cologne Scale (ECS) and evaluated its predictive accuracy for outcome and TBI presence compared with those of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).A retrospective ...
Michael, Hoffmann +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Emergency Medicine, 1992
ABSTRACTSince their inception, trauma scoring systems have developed to become a valuable aid in the management of traumatised patients, and in trauma audit and research. This article reviews the accepted trauma scoring methods and the attributes and weaknesses of each.
openaire +1 more source
ABSTRACTSince their inception, trauma scoring systems have developed to become a valuable aid in the management of traumatised patients, and in trauma audit and research. This article reviews the accepted trauma scoring methods and the attributes and weaknesses of each.
openaire +1 more source
Emergency trauma score: An instrument for early estimation of trauma severity*
Critical Care Medicine, 2009Early estimation of the mortality risk of severely injured patients is mandatory. To estimate the seriousness of the condition of patients with trauma, we developed the emergency trauma score (EMTRAS) for ease of use, with simple parameters that are available within 30 minutes.Prospective analysis of the German Trauma Registry of multitrauma patients ...
Raum, Marcus R. +8 more
openaire +2 more sources
Scoring severity in trauma: comparison of prehospital scoring systems in trauma ICU patients
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2016We evaluated the predictive ability of mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, age and arterial pressure (MGAP), Glasgow coma scale, age and systolic blood pressure (GAP), and triage-revised trauma Score (T-RTS) scores in patients from the Spanish trauma ICU registry using the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) as a reference standard.Patients admitted ...
J A, Llompart-Pou +11 more
openaire +2 more sources
Trauma scores and trauma outcome measures
Trauma, 2003Objective measurement and quantification of injury severity are necessary for triage, performance evaluation and research. In order to evaluate interventions, outcomes must also be compared. While this can be done using hospital stay or mortality, these will fail to detect subtle differences.
MP Revell +3 more
openaire +1 more source
The Predictive Validity of the Pediatric Trauma Score
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1987The Pediatric Trauma Score was evaluated in 450 injured children by a paramedic in the field and a physician in an E.D. There was agreement between the scores of these two individuals 93.6% of the time, correlation coefficient 0.991, r2 = 0.982. Further testing at the 0.01 level of significance indicated that a positive association existed between ...
M L, Ramenofsky +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1997
Most standard trauma score systems have been developed and validated in the United States. However, trauma differs between the United States and Germany. This prospective study tested the validity of eight current trauma scoring systems (Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, TRISSTS, TRISSRTS, Prehospital Index,
B, Bouillon +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Most standard trauma score systems have been developed and validated in the United States. However, trauma differs between the United States and Germany. This prospective study tested the validity of eight current trauma scoring systems (Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, TRISSTS, TRISSRTS, Prehospital Index,
B, Bouillon +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Maxillofacial trauma scoring systems
Injury, 2016The changing complexity of maxillofacial fractures in recent years has created a situation where classical systems of classification of maxillofacial injuries fall short of defining trauma particularly that observed with high-velocity collisions where more than one region of the maxillofacial skeleton is affected.
openaire +2 more sources

