Results 71 to 80 of about 5,211 (209)
Trump's Transactional Diplomacy: Breakthrough or Breakdown?
Middle East Policy, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 24-40, Summer 2026.Abstract The US‐Israeli war on Iran appears to demonstrate the perils of a transactional diplomacy that dismisses the rules‐based, liberal international order in pursuit of American dominance. Much of the growing literature assumes transactional diplomacy will be a temporary, Trump‐driven departure from traditional, values‐based statecraft. By contrast,
Guilain Denoeux, Robert Springborg
wiley +1 more source
How to Split Gains and Losses? Experimental Evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum Games
Games, 2018 Previous research has typically focused on distribution problems that emerge in the domain of gains. Only a few studies have distinguished between games played in the domain of gains from games in the domain of losses, even though, for example, prospect ...
Thomas Neumann +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior [PDF]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007 Experimental evidence suggests that many people are willing to deviate from materially maximizing strategies to punish unfair behavior. Even though little is known about the origins of such fairness preferences, it has been suggested that they have deep evolutionary roots and that they are crucial for maintaining and understanding cooperation among non-
Björn, Wallace +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Implicit motives and conflict intensity: A meta‐analysis of the roles of power and affiliation
Political Psychology, Volume 47, Issue 3, June 2026.Abstract Implicit motives are theorized to play important roles in driving conflicts toward high‐intensity outcomes like war or low‐intensity outcomes like peaceful resolution. While the link between power motivation and higher conflict intensity is empirically supported, the link between affiliation motivation and lower conflict intensity has been ...
Kate Y. Huang, Joyce S. Pang
wiley +1 more source
Interpretative problems with chimpanzee ultimatum game [PDF]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013 In an effort to compare fairness preferences in chimpanzees and children, Proctor et al. (1) have devised experiments aimed at replicating the essential features of two common experiments, the dictator game (DG) and the ultimatum game (UG). Here, we present both methodological concerns and broader interpretative issues.
Joseph, Henrich, Joan B, Silk
openaire +2 more sources
Psychophysiology, Volume 63, Issue 6, June 2026.ABSTRACT Adolescence is a particularly important period for prosocial development given the foundational changes that occur in social and reward neural systems. Despite the temporal and developmental advantages of electroencephalography (EEG), no studies have compiled and analyzed existing EEG evidence of adolescent prosocial development.
Rebecca Revilla +5 more
wiley +1 more source
The Ultimatum Game: An Introduction to Quantitative Literacy in a Social Justice Context
Numeracy, 2019 The Ultimatum Game is a two-person, multiple-strategy game widely used in the experimental social sciences to demonstrate the human propensity for costly punishment in response to inequitable treatment.
Robert Root
doaj +1 more source
"An eye for an eye"? Neural correlates of retribution and forgiveness. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2013 Humans have evolved strong preferences for equity and fairness. Neuroimaging studies suggest that punishing unfairness is associated with the activation of a neural network comprising the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, the ventral striatum ...
Martin Brüne, Georg Juckel, Björn Enzi
doaj +1 more source
CNS Neuroscience &Therapeutics, Volume 32, Issue 5, May 2026.A stability‐driven machine learning framework using EEG connectivity and network features enables accurate classification of psychosis. Theta‐band connectivity and global network efficiency emerge as consistent and interpretable markers, highlighting the importance of reproducible feature selection in small‐sample neuroimaging studies.
Mahdi Naeim, Mohammad Narimani
wiley +1 more source
The Paradox of Climate Justice
WIREs Climate Change, Volume 17, Issue 3, May/June 2026.Climate justice may paradoxically undermine ambitious emissions‐reduction policies, causing greater long‐term injustice through insufficient climate action. Heterodox instruments often are not systemic, suffer rebound effects, and are less feasible than mainstream alternatives.
Jeroen van den Bergh
wiley +1 more source