Results 261 to 270 of about 641,004 (305)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2002
An assessment of trees in Brooklyn, New York, reveal that this borough has approximately 610,000 trees with canopies that cover 11.4 percent of the area. The most common trees are estimated to be tree of heaven, white mulberry, black locust, Norway maple and black cherry. Brooklyn's trees currently store approximately 172,000 metric tons of carbon with
David J. Nowak +3 more
openaire +1 more source
An assessment of trees in Brooklyn, New York, reveal that this borough has approximately 610,000 trees with canopies that cover 11.4 percent of the area. The most common trees are estimated to be tree of heaven, white mulberry, black locust, Norway maple and black cherry. Brooklyn's trees currently store approximately 172,000 metric tons of carbon with
David J. Nowak +3 more
openaire +1 more source
1991
(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.
openaire +1 more source
(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.
openaire +1 more source
The Urban Forest: Chapter 5 explores forest valorization, and green capitalism more widely, as a cultural project. Efforts to make the forest culturally valuable were entangled with those to make it monetarily valuable in ways that reshaped the Acrean capital city and the lives of some of its residents.
+5 more sources
+5 more sources
Assessing urban forest effects and values, San Francisco's urban forest
2007An analysis of trees in San Francisco, CA reveals that this city has about 669,000 trees with canopies that cover 11.9 percent of the area. The most common tree species are blue gum eucalyptus, Monterey pine, and Monterey cypress. The urban forest currently stores about 196,000 tons of carbon valued at $3.6 million.
David J. Nowak +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Greenery as a mitigation and adaptation strategy to urban heat
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2021Nyuk Hien Wong +2 more
exaly
2012
In the previous chapters we have examined how people in urban areas are considered to differ from those living in the forest environment and villages and the rituals practiced beyond rural-urban divides. But what do “city” and “urban” actually signify for Amazonian Indians?
openaire +1 more source
In the previous chapters we have examined how people in urban areas are considered to differ from those living in the forest environment and villages and the rituals practiced beyond rural-urban divides. But what do “city” and “urban” actually signify for Amazonian Indians?
openaire +1 more source