Results 131 to 140 of about 36,687 (302)
!n Scotland, for hundreds of years, juries have chosen between three criminal verdicts: “guilty,” “not guilty,” and “not proven.” The “not proven” verdict’s legal meaning remains mysterious.
Whiteley, Jack
core
Learning Through Co‐opetition: How Knowledge Sharing Builds Supply Chain Resilience
ABSTRACT This study explores how knowledge sharing among competing firms (co‐opetition) influences risk management and enhances supply chain resilience. Grounded in organizational learning theory, the study examines how co‐opetition enhances firms' visibility into the emerging challenges of tomorrow's world, enabling proactive risk management that can ...
Jacob C. Jensen +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Experts react to Fitzhugh verdict
The verdict seems right in light of the ...
Palo Alto Daily News
core
Gregorini v. Shyamalan: Can Access Trump Similarity in a Globalised Digital Age?
Abstract On the 20th February 2025, the final judgement of Gregorini v. Shyamalan rejected director Gregorini's claims that the show ‘Servant’ produced by Apple TV+ copied her independent film ‘The Truth About Emanuel’. Infringement can be established by proving substantial similarity and access to the work.
Anna Monnereau
wiley +1 more source
The Special Verdict—Theory and Practice
At the 1949 Conference of Federal Judges of the Ninth Circuit I discussed the special verdict, and my address was published in the Washington Law Review. My treatment of the subject necessarily was largely theoretical as I had made very little use of the
Driver, Samuel M.
core
All-or-nothing verdict as a screening device [PDF]
An adversarial model of criminal trial is considered with three verdict choices-innocent, guilty of moderate crime, and guilty of serious crime. Depending on the parties' access to evidence and initial beliefs in the courtroom about the possible crimes ...
Bag, Parimal Kanti, Baç, Mehmet
core
Abstract Purpose In some contexts, US‐based White jurors appear to exhibit a heightened focus on legally relevant information when the defendant is Black as compared to White. The current study tested this ‘watchdog’ effect in the Canadian context by examining mock jurors' decisions using a trial involving a recanted confession with an Indigenous or a ...
Logan Ewanation, Evelyn M. Maeder
wiley +1 more source
Straddling “The Gulf Between Medicine and Law”: Medico‐legal addiction and Japanese psychiatry
Abstract Increasing punitive drug regulations in Japan amplify longstanding tensions within psychiatric practice, pushing psychiatrists to balance clinical obligations with complex socio‐legal demands. This article analyzes how psychiatrists specializing in illicit substance use disorders to navigate escalating criminalization by developing diagnostic ...
Selim Gokce Atici
wiley +1 more source
Local economic resilience and economic specialization in Greece during the crisis
Abstract This paper scrutinizes the issue of economic resilience, aiming to detect the existence of a systematic link with economic specialization. To this end, the paper conducts an empirical analysis at the local (i.e., municipal) level of Greece during the economic crisis period (2009–2015), providing cartographic visualizations and spatial ...
Panagiotis Artelaris +2 more
wiley +1 more source

