Results 41 to 50 of about 349,644 (345)

12 Confused Men: Using Flowchart Verdict Sheets To Mitigate Inconsistent Civil Verdicts [PDF]

open access: yes, 2014
The finality of jury verdicts reflects an implicit societal acceptance of the soundness of the jury\u27s decision. Regardless, jurors are not infallible, and the questions they are often tasked with deciding are unfortunately neither obvious nor clear ...
Fang, Jerry J.
core   +1 more source

Stranger Rape or Impromptu Consensual Sex? Investigating Mock Juror Decision‐Making in a Genuine Contested Rape Trial

open access: yesBehavioral Sciences &the Law, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to better understand juror decision‐making in a less typical rape trial scenario where even prior acquaintance is disputed. Adopting an improved mock trial paradigm including a video‐recorded recreation of a genuine rape allegation and jury‐group deliberation, 156 jury‐eligible participants took part in 1 of 13 ...
Dominic Willmott, Rosie Woodhams
wiley   +1 more source

The Consequences of issuance and nullification of tenant discharge verdict according to lessor and lessee relations Act 1978 [PDF]

open access: yesFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī, 2020
According to lessor and lessee relations Act 1978 and about hire rules, there are different and special sentences in comparison to civil law in Iran; one of these distinctions announces court based hire termination has different effects and consequences.
Pejman Mohamadi
doaj   +1 more source

Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: VERDICT Randomized Controlled Trial

open access: yesCirculation, 2018
Background: The optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome is not well defined.
K. Kofoed   +37 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Guilty But Mentally Ill: The Ethical Dilemma Of Mental Illness As A Tool Of The Prosecution [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
While other jurisdictions use guilty but mentally ill as a compromise verdict to fill the gap between guilty by reason of insanity and a guilty verdict after an unsuccessful insanity defense, Alaska has transformed the status into a prosecutorial tool
Johansen, Lauren G.
core   +1 more source

Sex Trafficking Myth Reduction: Evaluating an Educational Approach to Reducing Victim Blaming and Increasing Victim Empathy

open access: yesBehavioral Sciences &the Law, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This study examined the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention designed to reduce sex trafficking (ST) myth acceptance. Using a 2 × 2 mixed design, participants (N = 189) viewed either an educational video addressing common ST myths or a control video on human memory.
Dara Mojtahedi   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Vonis Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengeksaminasi Keterwakilan Perempuan

open access: yesJurnal Konstitusi, 2016
The verdict imposed by the Constitutional Court in the form of revocation of some parts of General Election Rules which arrange the determination of the representative who has the rights to occupy the council seats is not a verdict which discriminates ...
Mohamad Faisol
doaj   +1 more source

Fact or Fiction, It Is Time for a Verdict on Vasculogenic Mimicry?

open access: yesFrontiers in Oncology, 2019
The term vasculogenic mimicry (VM) refers to the capacity of certain cancer cells to form fluid-conducting structures within a tumor in an endothelial cell (EC)-free manner. Ever since its first report by Maniotis in 1999, the existence of VM has been an
A. Valdivia   +9 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Unveiling Bias: The Impact of Male Rape Myths and Stereotypes on Juror Verdicts in Male‐on‐Male Rape Trials

open access: yesBehavioral Sciences &the Law, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This study examined how male rape myths, racial/ethnicity biases, and sexuality stereotypes influence verdicts in male‐on‐male rape trials—an area that is currently under‐researched. A sample of 463 participants read a mock rape trial, where both the defendant and complainant were male, with defendant ethnicity (White, Black, Asian) and ...
Lee J. Curley   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

On Second Thought: The Impact of Confessions, DNA, and Belief Perseverance on Students' Perceptions of Guilt and Interrogations

open access: yesBehavioral Sciences &the Law, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Despite growing public knowledge of false confession cases, research with students and community members continues to find that people assume confessions indicate guilt. The present research explored the implications of belief perseverance: the tendency to maintain a belief even when confronted with compelling contradictory evidence.
Taya D. Henry   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy