Results 51 to 60 of about 57,618 (272)

L.S. Vygotsky and Education [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
Review: Moll, L. C. (2014). L.S. Vygotsky and education.
Zoshak, Rebecca, Rebecca Zoshak
core   +1 more source

On Revisionism in Vygotskian Science. Commentary on «In August of 1941» by Yasnitsky and Lamdan (2017)

open access: yesКультурно-историческая психология, 2021
In this article we analyze the shift in Vygotskian science from “archival revolution” to the revelatory “revisionist revolution”, which Yasnitsky and colleagues proclaimed in 2012.
Akhutina T.V.
doaj   +1 more source

Integrasi Media dalam Pembelajaran: Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Vygotsky

open access: yesAnterior Jurnal
Media use in learning has become an integral part of the modern education landscape. Despite the continuous advancements in educational technology, the effectiveness of learning media remains significantly determined by the pedagogical approach employed.
A. Azis, M. Hilmy, Desi Erawati
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Idade como um conceito materialista histórico na teoria histórico-cultural do desenvolvimento humano

open access: yesObutchénie, 2019
The concept of age has a central role in the theoretical structure of L. S. Vygotsky’s approach to analysing child development. This concept is presented in the first part of this article. The presentation is organized around three conceptual challenges,
Seth Chaiklin
doaj   +1 more source

Konstruktivisme Lev Semonovich Vygotsky dan Jerome Bruner: Model Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak

open access: yesNusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Purpose – The constructivist learning theories of Vygotsky and Bruner highlight the effectiveness of learning through interaction, collaboration, and cognitive apprenticeship.
Begjo Tohari, Ainur Rahman
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The Future of Research in Cognitive Robotics: Foundation Models or Developmental Cognitive Models?

open access: yesAdvanced Robotics Research, EarlyView.
Research in cognitive robotics founded on principles of developmental psychology and enactive cognitive science would yield what we seek in autonomous robots: the ability to perceive its environment, learn from experience, anticipate the outcome of events, act to pursue goals, and adapt to changing circumstances without resorting to training with ...
David Vernon
wiley   +1 more source

Speech in the debate on the report by K.S. Lashley (Moscow, 20 April 1931)

open access: yesКультурно-историческая психология
This is the first publication of the transcript of Lev Vygotsky’s speech during the debate on American psychophysiologist Karl Lashley’s report.2 After outlining the key innovations in Lashley’s theory concerning the ...
L.S. Vygotsky
doaj   +1 more source

La teoría vygotskyana de los afectos ante el capitalismo emocional en la escuela

open access: yesInterdisciplinaria, 2021
En la actualidad han cobrado relevancia los discursos sobre la importancia de atender la dimensión emocional en la escuela. Sin embargo, la conceptualización de las emociones en la escuela no le permite a esta desempeñar su rol transformador ...
Alfonso André Bonhomme Manriquez
doaj   +1 more source

KORELASI ANTARA TEORI BELAJAR KONSTRUKTIVISME LEV VYGOTSKY DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL)

open access: yesLEARNING Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
This study aims to analyze the relationship between Lev Vygotsky's constructivism learning theory and the problem-based learning (PBL) learning model. This research is a type of library research with a qualitative approach.
Yulia Rakhma Salsabila, Muqowim Muqowim
semanticscholar   +1 more source

King Aorta: Narrative anatomy education

open access: yesAnatomical Sciences Education, Volume 18, Issue 3, Page 264-276, March 2025.
Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of narrative anatomy education and traditional anatomy education on academic achievement. The study included 64 students who were randomly divided into two groups. The two groups were (n = 32) control (Group 1) and (n = 32) experimental (Group 2). The pretest scores of the two groups were 36.
Halil Yilmaz
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy