Results 131 to 140 of about 908 (148)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Comparing Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers in spinal cord injuries

Contemporary Nurse, 2000
When pressure ulcers occur health care services are faced with considerable challenges and costs. Additionally these ulcers cause significant physical and psycho-social impairment for patients and their families. The complexity of pressure ulcer management is widely acknowledged in the literature. However, the applicability of the major risk assessment
S, Wellard, S K, Lo
openaire   +2 more sources

The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency ScalesL Comparing Their Validity When Identifying Patients' Pressure Sore Risk

Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 2007
We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the Norton, Waterlow, and Braden Scales in identifying patients at pressure sore risk. An additional goal was to determine whether or not the Care Dependency Scale (CDS) is able to detect patients at risk for pressure sore development.The investigation was part of a prevalence study involving 754 patients ...
Katrin, Balzer   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: Interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units

International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2010
The application of standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment scales is recommended in clinical practice.The aims of this study were to compare the interrater reliabilities of the Braden and Waterlow scores and subjective pressure ulcer risk assessment and to determine the construct validity of these three assessment approaches.Observational.Two ...
Jan, Kottner, Theo, Dassen
openaire   +2 more sources

Pressure injuries in stroke patients: a comparison of the predictive abilities of Braden, Waterlow and Jackson/Cubbin risk assessment scales

Journal of Wound Care
Pressure injuries (PIs) are common complications of stroke and pose a significant threat to patient safety. Risk assessment scales are essential tools for evaluating and quantifying potential risk factors, identifying high-risk individuals, improving patient prognosis, and enhancing the overall quality of care.
Chunxiu Li   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Turkish Nurses' Opinions of the Braden and Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales: A Descriptive Pilot Study.

Ostomy/wound management, 2016
Risk evaluation scales are used as part of prevention strategies for pressure ulcers (PUs). Two of the more used scales, the Braden and Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales (B-PURAS and W-PURAS, respectively) are used in Turkey and worldwide, and their validity in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive validity have been examined ...
Karadag, Ayise, AVŞAR, PINAR
openaire   +2 more sources

[Validity of the Waterlow scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in the intensive care unit: a prospective analysis of 698 patients].

Pflege, 2008
Critically ill patients are at a particular risk for developing pressure ulcers. Yet until now, no sufficiently specific, validated pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments exist for critically ill patients. In a prospective study of 698 patients of medical intensive care unit (ICU), we therefore analyzed if the Waterlow scale is suitable for ...
Friederike, Compton   +6 more
openaire   +1 more source

BRADEN AND WATERLOW SCALES FOR PREDICTING PRESSURE ULCERS IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 2008
Letícia Faria Serpa   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic

International Journal of Nursing Practice, 2017
Katarina Žiaková   +1 more
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy