Retraction Statement: Paper by William Makis, Ilyes Baghli, and Pierrick Martinez entitled "Fenbendazole as an Anticancer Agent? A Case Series of Self-Administration in Three Patients" [Case Rep Oncol. 2025;18:856-863; https://doi.org/10.1159/000546362]. [PDF]
Case Rep Oncoleuropepmc +1 more source
Automated evaluation of accessibility issues of webpage content: tool and evaluation. [PDF]
Sci RepAra J, Sik-Lanyi C.
europepmc +1 more source
Retraction Statement: Paper by Sabin Goktas Aydin, Ahmet Bilici, Omer Fatih Olmez, Basak B. Oven, Ozgur Acikgoz, Tansel Cakir, Pelin Basim, Asli Cakir, Yasin Kutlu, and Jamshid Hamdard entitled "The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer" [Breast Care. 2022;17(5):470-479. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524446]. [PDF]
Breast Care (Basel)europepmc +1 more source
Verkkosisällön saavutettavuusohjeet (WCAG) 2.0, virallinen suomenkielinen käännös
, 2020 openaire +1 more source
Related searches:
The primary purpose of this research was to explore a comparative analysis of the ''Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)'' standard in Taiwan and the international WCAG standards (WCAG 1.0/WCAG 2.0). The WCAG in Taiwan was established by the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), Executive Yuan in 2002.
David C Yen
exaly +2 more sources
WCAG-Easy Tool : A tool based in the WCAG to learn web accessibility
2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2022Renan Soares Germano +1 more
exaly +2 more sources
A practitioner's approach to using WCAG evaluation tools
2017 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA), 2017Automatic testing tools for the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 are important for professional accessibility experts. These tools can detect approximately 50% of the success criteria. However, the rules used to detect errors are often not well documented, and even though a success criterion is said to be checked, this does not guarantee
Morten Tollefsen, Trond Ausland
exaly +2 more sources
Since the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG) became a W3C recommendation in May 1999, the Web has changed dramatically. This paper describes some of the major issues encountered because of these changes and the approaches developed to address them in WCAG 2.0.
Loretta Guarino Reid, Andi Snow-Weaver
openaire +1 more source
WCAG Compliance of Open Government Documents
Communications in Computer and Information ScienceMaarten Marx
exaly +2 more sources
WCAG formalization with W3C standards
Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '05, 2005Web accessibility consists on a set of checkpoints which are rather expensive to evaluate or to spot. However, using W3C technologies, this cost can be clearly minimized. This article presents a W3C formalized rule-set version for automatable checkpoints from WCAG 1.0.
Luque Centeno, Vicente +3 more
openaire +1 more source