Skip to main content

Genetical Aspects of Active Defence

  • Chapter
Active Defense Mechanisms in Plants

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((NSSA,volume 37))

  • 188 Accesses

  • 74 Citations

Abstract

I find myself in a rather uncomfortable position in presenting this paper. The reason for this is that what I have to say does not support much of the speculation and dogma that has been presented in preceding papers. I feel like a non-believer in a congregation of believers. The belief seems to be that specificity of the interactions between host and parasite, and the restriction of development of the pathogen, are controlled by compounds not produced by transcription and translation. This I find difficult to reconcile with the known genetics of interactions. What I will try to do, therefore, is to present the kinds of results obtained from studies of the inheritance of genetic variability in host-parasite interactions, then proceed to describe some models and give examples of what the genetics tells me about those models of interactions, and conclude with some examples of uses of genetic arguments in studies of host-parasite interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ELLINGBOE, A.H. (1976). Genetics of host-parasite interactions. In : Encyclodpedia of Plant Physiology New Series, Vol. 4, Physiological Plant Pathology, Eds. R. Heitefuss and P.H. Williams. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. ELLINGBOE, A.H. & GABRIEL, D.W. (1977). Induced conditional mutants for studying host/pathogen interactions. In: Induced mutations against plant diseases. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. FLOR, H.H. (1955). Host-parasite interaction in flax rust - its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology 45, 680–685

    Google Scholar 

  4. KEEN, N.T. (1980). Mechanisms conferring specific recognition in gene-for-gene plant-parasite systems (this Symposium)

    Google Scholar 

  5. LAWRENCE, G.J., MAYO, G.M.E. & SHEPHERD, K.W. Interactions between genes controlling pathogenicity in flax rust. Phytopathology in press

    Google Scholar 

  6. LOEGERING, W.Q. (1978). Current concepts in Interorganismla Genetics. Annual Review of Phytopathology 16, 309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. RASCHKE, W.C., KERN, K.A., ANTOLIS, C. & BALLOU, C.E. (1973). Genetic control of yeast mannan structure-isolation and characterization of mannan mutants. Journal of Biological Chemistry 248, 4660–4666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. WADE, M. & ALBERSHEIM, P. (1979). Race-specific molecules that protect soybeans from Phytophthora megasperma var. sojae. Proceedings National Academy of Science, U.S.A. 76, 4433–4437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellingboe, A.H. (1982). Genetical Aspects of Active Defence. In: Wood, R.K.S. (eds) Active Defense Mechanisms in Plants. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 37. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8309-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8309-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8311-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8309-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics