Abstract
Passive euthanasia occurs where the use of “extraordinary” life-sustaining measures are discontinued or refrained from. No more “heroic” efforts are made in an attempt to prolong life in hopeless cases where such prolongation seems an unwarranted extension of either suffering or unconsciousness. Generally speaking, the medical fraternity is more prone to withhold treatment than withdrawing it per se. Many countries around the globe have addressed the issue of passive euthanasia to decriminalize it. However, the two factions of for and against are convicted in their arguments. This entry will briefly address arguments in favor, namely, autonomy and the regulation of euthanasia and those against which are sanctity of life, slippery slope, danger of abuse, and the financial burden argument. Discussing passive euthanasia, one cannot negate the importance of culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, M. (1988). Euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1348–1350.
Aramesh, K., & Shadi, H. (2007). An Islamic perspective on euthanasia. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(4), 65–66.
Bachman, J. G., Alcser, K. H., Doukas, D. J., Lichtenstein, R. L., Corning, A. D., & Brody, H. (1996). Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 303–309.
Blendon, R. J., Szalay, V. S., & Knox, R. A. (1992). Should physicians aid their patients in dying? Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(19), 2658–2662.
British Medical Association. (2007). Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging medical treatment: Guidance for decision making. London: British Medical Journal Books.
Dare, C. (1987). Pain in terminal cancer. South African Journal of Continuing Medical Education, 5, 47–59.
Doron, D., Wexler, I. D., Shabtai, E., & Corn, B. W. (2014). Israeli dying patient act – Physician knowledge and attitudes. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37, 597–602.
Genuis, S. J., Genuis, S. K., & Chang, W.-C. (1994). Public attitudes toward the right to die. Canadian Medical Journal, 150(5), 701–708.
Hawley, G. (2007). Ethics in clinical practice – An interprofessional approach (pp. 293–294). Harlow: Pearson.
Key, P. (1989). Euthanasia: Law and morality. Auckland University Law Review, 6(2), 224–244.
Sagel-Grande, I. (1998). The decriminalisation of euthanasia in The Netherlands. Acta Criminologica, 11(1), 104–112.
Schanker, D. (1996). Of suicide machines, euthanasia legislation, and health care crisis. In M. I. Urofsky & P. E. Urofsky (Eds.), The right to die: Definitions and moral Perspectives (pp. 63–95). New York: Garland.
WHO. (2015). World health statistics 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2015.
Wiegand, D. (2008). In their own time: The family experience during the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11(8), 1115–1121.
Wise, J. (1996). Public supports euthanasia for most desperate cases. British Medical Journal, 313, 1423.
Further Readings
Biggs, H. (2001). Euthanasia, death with dignity and the law. Oxford: Hart.
Haerens, M. (2015). Euthanasia (opposing viewpoints). Independence: Cengage Learning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nortjé, N. (2015). Euthanasia: Passive. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_182-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_182-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Living Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities