Skip to main content

Abstract

The Semantic Web [1] is proposed to be an extension to the the current Web. It features a set of technical standards, ontological markup languages and other related technologies. The Semantic Web can be considered as a Web of data, in which data and the relations among different entities can be easily processed by machines. In the Semantic Web, each entity is referred to by a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI). Entities in one dataset can be linked to another dataset in a way very much similar to that in the way one Web page is linked to another on the Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The SemanticWeb. Sci Am 284(5): 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raggett D, Hors AL, Jacobs I (1999) Html 4.01 Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/. Accessed 22 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou G, van Harmelen F (2004) A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guarino N, Poli R (1995) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Int J Hum Comp Stud 43: 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lassila O, Swick RR (1999) Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/. Accessed 7 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGuinness DL, van Harmelen F (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/. Accessed 22 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith B, Welty C (2001) Ontology-towards a New Synthesis. In: FOIS’ 01: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, ACM Press, New York, pp 3–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Brachman RJ, Levesque HJ (2004) Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber TR (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2): 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamma V, Bench-Capon T (2002) An Ontology Model to Facilitate Knowledge Sharing in Multi-agent Systems. Knowl Eng Rev 17(1): 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding Y, Foo S (2002) Ontology Research and Development Part 1—a Review of Ontology Generation. J Inf Sci 28(2): 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez-Perez A, Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M (2004) Ontological Engineering: With Examples From the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D et al (eds) (2003) The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks I, van Harmelen F, Patel-Schneider PF (2001) DAML+OIL Reference Description. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html. Accessed 22 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ding Y, Foo S (2002) Ontology Research and Development: Part 2: a Review of Ontology Mapping and Evolving. J Inf Sci 28(4): 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brickley D, Miller L (2010) Foaf Vocabulary Specification 0.98.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, van Harmelen F (2003) From SH IQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language. J Web Semantics 1(1): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt-Schaubá M, Smolka G (1991) Attributive Concept Descriptions with Complements. Artif Intell 486(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nardi D, Brachman RJ (2003) An Introduction to Description Logics. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borgida A (1995) Description Logics in Data Management. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 7(5): 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spackman KA, Campbell KE, Cot’e RA (2000) SNOMEDRT: A Reference Terminology for Health Care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Horrocks I, McGuinness DL (2003) Digital Libraries and Web-based Information Systems. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Higher Education Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cai, Y., Au Yeung, Cm., Leung, Hf. (2012). Knowledge Representation on the Web. In: Fuzzy Computational Ontologies in Contexts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25456-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25456-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25455-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25456-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics