Abstract
It is harder morally to justify letting somebody die a slow and ugly death, dehumanized, than it is to justify helping him to escape from such misery. This is the case at least in any code of ethics which is humanistic or personalistic, i.e., in any code of ethics which has a value system that puts humanness and personal integrity above biological life and function. It makes no difference whether such an ethics system is grounded in a theistic or a naturalistic philosophy. We may believe that God wills human happiness or that man’s happiness is, as Protagoras thought, a self-validating standard of the good and the right. But what counts ethically is whether human needs come first—not whether the ultimate sanction is transcendental or secular.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fletcher, J. (1973). Ethics and Euthanasia. In: Williams, R.H. (eds) To Live and To Die: When, Why, and How. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4369-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4369-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90097-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4369-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive