Skip to main content
  • 226 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

It is harder morally to justify letting somebody die a slow and ugly death, dehumanized, than it is to justify helping him to escape from such misery. This is the case at least in any code of ethics which is humanistic or personalistic, i.e., in any code of ethics which has a value system that puts humanness and personal integrity above biological life and function. It makes no difference whether such an ethics system is grounded in a theistic or a naturalistic philosophy. We may believe that God wills human happiness or that man’s happiness is, as Protagoras thought, a self-validating standard of the good and the right. But what counts ethically is whether human needs come first—not whether the ultimate sanction is transcendental or secular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fletcher, J. (1973). Ethics and Euthanasia. In: Williams, R.H. (eds) To Live and To Die: When, Why, and How. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4369-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4369-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90097-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4369-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics