Skip to main content

Quality Assessment In Bachelor’s And Master’s Theses

  • Chapter
Educational Innovation in Economics and Business II

Part of the book series: Educational Innovation in Economics and Business ((EIEB,volume 2))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

The quality of education must in the end be evaluated by the destiny of the students. Do they develop in the directions we hope for? Do we know what we are hoping for? This paper is a case study of how different ideas about quality in Masters theses has been debated and experimented with. The connection between ideas about quality and different ideas of education objectives is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1990) Overcoming Organizational Defences, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, Steven (1994) In an Age of Experts, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991) The Unschooled Mind: How children think and how schools should teach, New York, Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1992) Phenomenography and “the art of teaching all things to all men”, International journal of Qualiative Studies in Education, 5, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molander, B. (1996) Kunskap i handling [Knowledge in acting], Daidalos, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, Ö. (1990) Samverkan och handling [Co-operation and Action], BAS, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C.R. (1961) On Becoming a Person, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C.R. (1983) Freedom to Learn for the Eighties, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1991, 1983) The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think in Action, Aldershots.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1991) The Fifth Discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1990) Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G.H.v. (1986) Vetenskapen och förnuftet [Science and reason], Söderströms, Helsingfors.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ohlsson, Ö. (1998). Quality Assessment In Bachelor’s And Master’s Theses. In: Tempelaar, D.T., Wiedersheim-Paul, F., Gunnarsson, E. (eds) Educational Innovation in Economics and Business II. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5268-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5268-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6217-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5268-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics