Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RANS and LES of a Turbulent Jet Ignition System Fueled with Iso-Octane

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behaviour of a homogeneously charged Turbulent Jet Ignition (TJI) system, fueled with iso-octane was investigated numerically using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. This study was an attempt to capture the start of autoignition in a lean charge TJI system, numerically, and, validate the results with experimental pressure measurements and OH chemilominescence images recorded during high speed imaging. Experiments were performed in an optically acessible Rapid Compression Machine (RCM) and the effect of auxiliary fuel injection in the prechamber and ignition distribution through various orrifices was investigated in depth through jet induced autoignition analysis. Heat release and pressure trace analysis were completed to capture the onset of autoignition, as well as comparing LES and RANS capabilities in this regard. Results showed that enhanced prechamber fueling leads to an increase in combustion stability while reducing the ignition delay. It was determined that keeping the prechamber mixture near stoichiometric is essential in order to have a more powerful turbulent jet discharged into the main chamber and to enhance ultra-lean main chamber combustion. The predicted flame propagation speed in the lean iso-octane mixtures was found to be slower than that observed in the experimental measurements. Results showed that the LES turbulence model is capable of predicting the start of autoignition more accurately and enhances the accuracy of the calculated peak pressure and burn rates relative to the RANS model. Two detailed iso-octane mechanisms were tested and based on the ignition delay comparisons, the LLNL-v3 mechanism was used in the current study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Cho, H.M., He, B.-Q.: Spark ignition natural gas engines—a review. Energy Convers. Manag. 48(2), 608–618 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Toulson, E., Schock, H.J., Attard, W.P.: A Review of Pre-Chamber Initiated Jet Ignition Combustion Systems. SAE International (2010)

  3. Schlatter, S.: Experimental and Numerical Characterization of Enhanced Ignition Systems for Large Bore gas Engines. ETH-Zürich (2015)

  4. Hensinger, D.M., et al.: Jet Plume Injection and Combustion. SAE International (1992)

  5. Maxson, J.A., Oppenheim, A.K.: Pulsed jet combustion—key to a refinement of the stratified charge concept. Symp. Combust. 23(1), 1041–1046 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feyz, M.E., et al.: Three-dimensional simulation of turbulent hot-jet ignition for air-CH4-H2 deflagration in a confined volume. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 101(1), 123–137 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gholamisheeri, M., et al.: Rapid compression machine study of a premixed, variable inlet density and flow rate, confined turbulent jet. Combustion and Flame. 169, 321–332 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gholamisheeri, M., Wichman, I., Toulson, E.: A study of the turbulent jet flow field in a methane fueled turbulent jet ignition system. Combustion and Flame. (2017)

  9. Biswas, S., Qiao, L.: Prechamber hot jet ignition of ultra-lean H2/air mixtures: effect of supersonic jets and combustion instability. SAE Int. J. Engines. 9(3), (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maxson, J.A., et al.: Performance of Multiple Stream Pulsed Jet Combustion Systems. SAE International (1991)

  11. Chinnathambi, P., et al.: Performance Assessment of a Single Jet, Dual Diverging Jets, and Dual Converging Jets in an Auxiliary Fueled Turbulent Jet Ignition System. SAE International (2018)

  12. Gentz, G., et al.: A study of the influence of orifice diameter on a turbulent jet ignition system through combustion visualization and performance characterization in a rapid compression machine. Appl. Therm. Eng. 81, 399–411 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gentz, G., Gholamisheeri, M., Toulson, E.: A study of a turbulent jet ignition system fueled with iso-octane: pressure trace analysis and combustion visualization. Appl. Energy. 189, 385–394 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gentz, G.R.: Experimental Studies of Turbulent Jet Ignition: Combustion Visualization and Pressure Trace Analysis Using an Optically Accessible Rapid Compression Machine. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (2016)

  15. Duong, J., Combustion Visualization in a Large Bore Gas Engine. 2013

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heinz, C., Kammerstätter, S., Sattelmayer, T.: Prechamber ignition concepts for stationary large bore gas engines. MTZ worldwide eMagazine. 73(1), 60–65 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Toulson, E., et al.: Visualization of propane and natural gas spark ignition and turbulent jet ignition combustion. SAE Int. J. Engines. 5(4), 1821–1835 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gholamisheeri, M., et al.: CFD Modeling of an Auxiliary Fueled Turbulent Jet Ignition System in a Rapid Compression Machine. SAE International (2016)

  19. Gholamisheeri, M., Thelen, B., Toulson, E.: CFD Modeling and Experimental Analysis of a Homogeneously Charged Turbulent Jet Ignition System in a Rapid Compression Machine. SAE International (2017)

  20. Gholamisheeri, M., Toulson, E.: CFD modeling of a homogeneously charged turbulent jet ignition system using large Eddy simulations. In: 10th U.S. National Combustion Meeting, College Park, MD (2017)

  21. Toulson, E., Watson, H.C., Attard, W.P.: Gas Assisted Jet Ignition of Ultra-Lean LPG in a Spark Ignition Engine. SAE International (2009)

  22. Toulson, E., Watson, H.C., Attard, W.P.: The Lean Limit and Emissions at Near-Idle for a Gasoline HAJI System with Alternative Pre-Chamber Fuels. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (2007)

  23. Jouzdani, S., et al.: Methane and methyl Propanoate high-temperature kinetics. Energy Fuel. 32(11), 11864–11875 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allen, C., Advanced rapid compression machine test methods and surrogate fuel modeling for bio-derived jet and diesel fuel autoignition. 2012

  25. Attard, W.P., Blaxill, H.: A single fuel pre-chamber jet ignition powertrain achieving high load, high efficiency and near zero NOx emissions. SAE Int. J. Engines. 5(3), 734–746 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Attard, W.P., Blaxill, H.: A gasoline fueled pre-chamber jet ignition combustion system at Unthrottled conditions. SAE Int. J. Engines. 5(2), 315–329 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Duva, B.C., Chance, L., Toulson, E.: Laminar Flame Speeds of Premixed Iso-Octane/Air Flames at High Temperatures with CO2 Dilution. SAE International (2019)

  28. Vedula, R.T., et al.: Lean Burn Combustion of Iso-Octane in a Rapid Compression Machine Using Dual Mode Turbulent Jet Ignition System. SAE International (2018)

  29. Gholamisheeri, M., Wichman, I.S., Toulson, E.: A study of the turbulent jet flow field in a methane fueled turbulent jet ignition (TJI) system. Combustion and Flame. 183(Supplement C), 194–206 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gentz, G., et al.: Combustion visualization, performance, and CFD modeling of a pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition system in a rapid compression machine. SAE Int. J. Engines. 8(2), 538–546 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thelen, B.C., Toulson, E.: A computational study on the effect of the orifice size on the performance of a turbulent jet ignition system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 231(4), 536–554 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chinnathambi, P., Bunce, M., Cruff, L.: RANS Based Multidimensional Modeling of an Ultra-Lean Burn Pre-Chamber Combustion System with Auxiliary Liquid Gasoline Injection. SAE International (2015)

  33. Xu, G., et al.: CFD-Simulation of Ignition and Combustion in Lean Burn Gas Engines. SAE International (2016)

  34. Gholamisheeri, M., S. Givler, and E. Toulson, Large eddy simulation of a homogeneously charged turbulent jet ignition system. International Journal of Engine Research: p. 1468087417742834

  35. Chinnathambi, P., Wadkar, C., Toulson, E.: Impact of CO2 Dilution on Ignition Delay Times of Iso-Octane at 15% and 30% Dilution Levels in a Rapid Compression Machine. SAE International (2019)

  36. Hessel, R.P., et al.: Modeling Iso-Octane HCCI Using CFD with Multi-Zone Detailed Chemistry; Comparison to Detailed Speciation Data over a Range of Lean Equivalence Ratios. SAE International (2008)

  37. Huang, C., Yasari, E., Lipatnikov, A.: A Numerical Study on Stratified Turbulent Combustion in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Gasoline Engine Using an Open-Source Code. SAE International (2014)

  38. Mittal, G., Raju, M.P., Sung, C.-J.: Computational fluid dynamics modeling of hydrogen ignition in a rapid compression machine. Combustion and Flame. 155(3), 417–428 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hajilou, M., et al.: Experimental and numerical characterization of freely propagating ozone-activated dimethyl ether cool flames. Combustion and Flame. 176, 326–333 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sagaut, P. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows : an Introduction. 2006; Available from: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=304365

  41. Pope, S.: Computations of turbulent combustion: progress and challenges. In: Symposium (International) on Combustion. 1991. Elsevier

  42. Pope, S.B.: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge;New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Pope, S.B.: Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys. 6(1), 35 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Richards, K., Senecal, P., Pomraning, E.: CONVERGE (Version 2.2). Converge Science Inc., Middleton, WI (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deardorff, J.W.: A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 41(02), 453–480 (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Lilly, D.K.: The representation of small scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In: IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smagorinsky, J., General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. the basic experiment*. Monthly weather review, 1963. 91(3): p. 99–164

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yakhot, V., et al.: Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Phys. Fluids A. 4(7), 1510–1520 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Germano, M.: Turbulence: the filtering approach. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325–336 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Senecal, P.K., et al.: A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to in-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations. SAE International (2007)

  51. Wygnanski, I., Fiedler, H.: Some measurements in the self-preserving jet. J. Fluid Mech. 38(3), 577–612 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  52. 2018 [cited 2019 01/13/2019]; Available from: https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials

  53. Pei, Y., et al.: Large eddy simulation of a reacting spray flame with multiple realizations under compression ignition engine conditions. Combustion and Flame. 162(12), 4442–4455 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mehl, M., et al. Chemical kinetic modeling of component mixtures relevant to gasoline. 2009

  55. Mehl, M., et al.: Detailed Kinetic Modeling of Low-Temperature Heat Release for PRF Fuels in an HCCI Engine. SAE International (2009)

  56. Mehl, M., et al.: Kinetic modeling of gasoline surrogate components and mixtures under engine conditions. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33(1), 193–200 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Raju, M., et al., A Reduced Diesel Surrogate Mechanism for Compression Ignition Engine Applications. 2012(55096): p. 711–722

  58. Lu, T., Law, C.K.: A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30(1), 1333–1341 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mittal, G., Raju, M.P., Bhari, A.: A numerical assessment of the novel concept of crevice containment in a rapid compression machine. Combustion and Flame. 158(12), 2420–2427 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mittal, G., Sung, C.-J.: Aerodynamics inside a rapid compression machine. Combustion and Flame. 145(1–2), 160–180 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mahesh, K., et al., Progress toward large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting and non-reacting flows in complex geometries

  62. Tsang, C.-W., Trujillo, M.F., Rutland, C.J.: Large-eddy simulation of shear flows and high-speed vaporizing liquid fuel sprays. Comput. Fluids. 105, 262–279 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Amsden, A.A., Butler, T.D., O'Rourke, P.J.: The KIVA-II computer program for transient multidimensional chemically reactive flows with sprays. SAE Trans. 373–383 (1987)

  64. Schmidt, D.P., Rutland, C.: A new droplet collision algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 164(1), 62–80 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Naber, J., Reitz, R.D.: Modeling engine spray/wall impingement. SAE Trans. 118–140 (1988)

  66. Manuel, A., et al.: A Study of Diesel Cold Starting Using both Cycle Analysis and Multidimensional Calculations. SAE International (1991)

  67. Bracco, R.D.R.a.F.V.: Mechanisms of breakup of round liquid jets. In: Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, pp. 223–249. Gulf Publishing Company (1986)

  68. Joseph, D.D., Belanger, J., Beavers, G.: Breakup of a liquid drop suddenly exposed to a high-speed airstream. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 25(6–7), 1263–1303 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. O'Rourke, P.J., Amsden, A.: A spray/wall interaction submodel for the KIVA-3 wall film model. SAE Trans. 281–298 (2000)

  70. Han, Z., Reitz, R.D.: A temperature wall function formulation for variable-density turbulent flows with application to engine convective heat transfer modeling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 40(3), 613–625 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Amsden, KIVA-3V: A block-structured KIVA program for engines with vertical or canted valves, r. 1997

  72. Nguyen, H., et al.: Performance and Efficiency Evaluation and Heat Release Study of a Direct-Injection Stratified-Charge Rotary Engine. SAE Technical Paper (1987)

  73. Pitsch, H.: Unsteady flamelet modeling of differential diffusion in turbulent jet diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame. 123(3), 358–374 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kim, W.-W. and S. Menon. A new dynamic one-equation subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. in 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

  75. Celik, I.B., Cehreli, Z.N., Yavuz, I.: Index of resolution quality for large Eddy simulations. J. Fluids Eng. 127(5), 949–958 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Davidson, L.: Large eddy simulations: how to evaluate resolution. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 30(5), 1016–1025 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rezaeiravesh, S., Liefvendahl, M.: Effect of grid resolution on large eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 30(5), 055106 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bae, H.J., et al.: Turbulence intensities in large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded flows. Physical Review Fluids. 3(1), 014610 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Davidson, L.: How to estimate the resolution of an LES of recirculating flow, in Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II, pp. 269–286. Springer (2011)

Download references

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by The United States Department of Energy and The National Science Foundation Partnership on Advanced Combustion Engines under contract: CBET-1258581.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masumeh Gholamisheeri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

For implicitly-filtered LES, as is the case for the Finite Volume Method (FVM) used in this study, the grid filtering is intertwined with the spatial discretization. Therefore, for this type of LES no grid convergence can be expected, see e.g. [43]. However, the grid resolution is the main error controller of the LES and it must be fine enough to sufficiently resolve active turbulent structures. To quantify such sufficiency and hence assess the quality of LES, different posteriori measures can be utilized. One is the LES-index of quality (LESIQ) proposed by Celik et al. [75]. This index reads as,

$$ {LES}_{IQ}=1-\frac{\left|{k}_{tot}-{k}_{res}\right|}{k_{tot}}; $$
(8)

where, ktot is the total turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that reflects the “true physics” and can be captured by an accurate direct numerical simulation (DNS), and, kres specifies the portion of TKE that is directly resolved by LES. The difference between these, i.e. (ktot-kres) is the effective SGS TKE (associated with unresolved structures) which is modeled and hence is shown by kmod. According to Pope [43], evaluation of kmod that represents the TKE due to the residual motions is not straightforward. According to [43, 76], one way for approximating kmod is to compute \( \raisebox{1ex}{$\left\langle {\tau}_{kk}\right\rangle $}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$2$}\right. \), which is the average of the trace of the SGS stress tensor τ, where \( {\tau}_{ij}=\left(\overline{u_i{u}_j}-\overline{u_i}\overline{u_j}\right) \). For a Boussinesq type of SGS modeling, the anisotropic part of τij is modeled as Eq. 1. Clearly from this definition, τkk cannot be directly evaluated since it is absorbed in the pressure gradient term in the Navier-Stokes equations. According to Davidson [76], one way of computing τkk and hence, approximating kmod is to use a SGS model which directly solves for kmod, such as the model proposed by Kim and Menon [74]. However, in the LES reported in the paper we have only used standard Smagorinsky model that does not allow for direct computation of τkk.

Another way of evaluating LESIQ is to directly compare the kres to a reference highly-resolved ktot (e.g. from a reference DNS). In our case, this was not however an option, noting the complexity of the geometry and multiphysics nature of the problem which make a DNS computationally intractable.

Nevertheless, the LESIQ might not be the best technique to evaluate the quality of LES. It has been shown, for instance see [77, 78] that for different combinations of the grid resolution in different directions, the profile of kres may exceed the ktot, which is clearly unphysical.

In two extensive studies performed by Davidson [76, 79], several measures for assessing the quality of LES were evaluated. In the end, it was shown that the two-point correlation of velocity is the most reliable one. This has been also confirmed, for instance, in [77]. Employing these techniques for the RCM configuration is non-trivial and may require approximations, since there is no spatial direction over which the flow is statically homogeneous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gholamisheeri, M., Givler, S. & Toulson, E. RANS and LES of a Turbulent Jet Ignition System Fueled with Iso-Octane. Flow Turbulence Combust 104, 209–231 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00049-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00049-5

Keywords