Skip to main content
Log in

Delayed mutation in Chinese hamster cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The possibility was examined that mutational events can be delayed for more than one or two cell divisions following treatment of Chinese hamster cells with the DNA alkylating agent ethyl methane sulfonate. If mutations in mammalian cells are delayed, the proportion of mutant cells in colonies grown from single mutagen-treated cells will reflect the cell division at which the mutation is genetically fixed, i.e., a first division mutation yields a 1/2 mutant colony, a fifth division mutation produces a 1/32 mutant colony, etc. In the present study, replating of cells from single colonies grown for six to seven days after mutagen treatment resulted in the discrete ratios of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-deficient mutant to wild-type colonies expected for a delayed mutational process which produces mutations over at least 8–10 cell generations. Further, when cells from 7- to 10-day colonies, grown from ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS)-treated cells were replated into selective medium containing 6-thioguanine (6TG), the number of 6TG-resistant colonies obtained per flask was distributed over a very wide range, consistent with a mutational delay process. These results could not be explained by differences in the number of cells per colony or plating efficiency in selective medium. Assuming that the relative number of 6TG-resistant colonies per flask reflects the time of mutation, EMS treatment produced two groups of mutational events: one which occurred within the first five cell generations and another uniformly distributed over at least the next eight to nine divisions. These results support the conclusion that EMS induces mutants for at least 10–14 cell generations after treatment and raise the possibility that current methods to assess the mutagenic potential of an agent might lead to significant underestimation. The role of delayed mutation in the phenomenon of “mutation expression time” is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Literature cited

  1. Witkin, E.M. (1976).Bacteriol. Rev. 40:869–907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Witkin, E.M. (1975).Mol. Gen. Genet. 142:87–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimball, R.F. (1978).Mutat. Res. 55:85–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schendel, P.F. (1981).Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 9:311–362.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schendel, P.F., and Michaeli, I. (1984).Mutat. Res. 125:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, M. (1983).Cancer Biol. Rev. 3:23–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stamato, T.D., Mackanzie, L., Pagani, J.M., and Weinstein, R. (1982).Somat. Cell Genet. 8:643–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stamato, T.D., Weinstein, R., and Giaccia, A. (1984).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 10:429–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Terashima, T., and Tolmach, L.J. (1963).Exp. Cell Res. 30:344–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenstraus, M., and Chasin, L.A. (1975).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72:493–497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Neill, P., Couch, D.B., Machanoff, R., San Sebastian, J.R., Brimer, P.A., and Hsie, A.W. (1977).Mutat. Res. 45:103–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer, B. (1979).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 62:1329–1339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren, W., Crathorn, A.R., and Shooter, K.V. (1979).Biochem. Biophys. Acta 563:82–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawley, P.D. (1976).Am. Chem. Soc. Monogr. 173:83–244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts, J.J. (1978).Adv. Radiat. Chem. 7:211–436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goth-Goldstein, R. (1980).Cancer Res. 40:2623–2624.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Durrant, L.G., Margison, G.P., and Boyle, J.M. (1981).Carcinogenesis 2:55–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wild, C.P., Smart, G., Saffhill, R., and Boyle, J.M. (1983).Carcinogenesis 4:1605–1609.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Day, R.S. III, Ziolkowski, C.H.J., Scudiero, D.A., Meyer, S.A., Lubiniecki, A.S., Girardi, A.J., Galloway, S.M., and Bynum, G.D. (1980).Nature 288:724–727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stamato, T., Weinstein, R., Peters, B. et al. Delayed mutation in Chinese hamster cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 13, 57–65 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422299

Keywords